Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Search
Close this search box.

What Could Happen to My Green Card if I am Outside the United States for More than 180 Days Due to COVID-19 Travel Restrictions?

There are many reasons why a lawful permanent resident (“LPR”) would remain outside the United States for more than 180 days. However, staying outside the U.S. for a long period could result in the U.S. government taking the position that an LPR has abandoned his or her intent to live in the U.S. as a permanent resident and it could take steps to revoke the LPRs resident status.

With the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic causing movement and travel restrictions, many LPR’s have unfortunately been unable to travel to the U.S. and have been abroad for a prolonged period. While the COVID-19 pandemic could certainly be viewed as an unforeseen and exceptional circumstance and thus, the LPR has not abandoned his or her immigrant status, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency (“CBP”) maintains independent discretion in making such determination especially in situations where a LPR shows frequent and prolonged travel outside the United States.

An LPR who has been outside the United States may be subjected to secondary inspection by a CBP officer upon his or her arrival at the Port of Entry (“POE”) by land, sea or air. An LPR who has been outside for a prolonged period of time such as more than 180 days has an increased possibility of being subjected to secondary inspection.

Upon arrival at the POE, LPRs may be asked by an interviewing CBP officer to what countries they traveled, how long they have been away, and the reasons why they were traveling to that destination. If a CBP officer is concerned that an LPR’s prolonged absence outside the United States is unusual or suspicious, the CBP officer may request that the LPR undergo secondary inspection.

When an LPR enters secondary inspection, they may be detained for a few minutes to several hours or longer. During the process, a CBP officer will ask the incoming LPR additional questions to determine resident intent before they will be allowed to be admitted to the United States. Additional questions during secondary inspection will delve deeper into why the LPR has remaining outside the United States for a long period, whether they are working abroad, and their family and financial ties to the United States.

It is important for an LPR to understand that he or she has the right to be allowed entry and cannot be forced to sign any documents giving up resident status or being forced to return to their destination. See our other article for more information on Knowing your Rights as an LPR.

For more information on LPR’s currently in Asia who have been unable to travel back to the United States due to the COVID-19 pandemic, contact us today at info@enterlinepartners.com and speak with an U.S. immigration lawyer in Ho Chi Minh City, Manila and Taipei.

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office

Suite 601, 6th Floor, Saigon Tower
29 Le Duan Street
Ben Nghe Ward, District 1
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Tel: +84 933 301 488

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ

Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office

Unit 2507 Cityland 10 Tower 1
156 H.V. Dela Costa Street
Makati City, Philippines 1209

Tel: +632 5310 1491

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines

Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

Copyright 2020. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

Supreme Court Hands the Trump Administration a Partial Victory in Ongoing Birthright Citizenship Litigation

The United States Supreme Court has given President Donald Trump’s Executive Order (“EO”) curbing birthright citizenship a partial victory. The ruling does not impact “Birthright Citizenship” but rather restricts district court judges from issuing nation-wide (or “universal”) injunctions against Executive Orders.  In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that lower federal court judges who issued nationwide injunctions against the EO went too far and granted the Trump Administration’s request to narrow the injunctions issued in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts. While the Supreme Court’s ruling was a dramatic shift in how lower federal court judges have operated for years, the decision left enough room for challengers to the EO to prevent it from taking effect while litigation works its way through the federal court system. Specifically, the EO, which also suffered a setback by the Federal Court of Appeals will remain blocked for an additional thirty (30) days) allowing the

Read more >

When Do Sponsor Obligations End Under Form I-864?

For immigrants to the United States, the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support (“Form I-864”), is a critical part of the family-based immigration process. It is a legally enforceable contract in which a sponsor agrees to financially support the intended immigrant, helping ensure that the immigrant does not rely on certain U.S. government benefits after becoming a permanent resident. By signing Form I-864, the sponsor takes on long-term financial responsibility, but this obligation is not indefinite. The U.S. government outlines specific situations under which the sponsor’s duties come to an end. When Will These Obligations End?  A sponsors obligations under a Form I-864 end when the sponsored immigrant: A sponsor’s obligations under a Form I-864 also end if the sponsor dies. As such, the sponsor’s estate is not required to take responsibility for the sponsored immigrant following the sponsor’s death. Divorce does not terminate the responsibility, and if the sponsor dies,

Read more >

F, M and J Student Visa Interviews to Resume with Enhanced Social Media Vetting

The United States Department of State (“DOS”) has instructed Embassies and Consulates to begin accepting new F, M, and J student visa application appointments following a temporary suspension. The pause was initiated to allow DOS to implement policy changes regarding social media vetting. After the suspension, e F, M, and J student visa applicants are required to make their social media accounts public for vetting purposes. In a DOS announcement, DOS will use all information available for “visa screening and vetting to identify visa applicants who are inadmissible to the United States, including those who pose a threat to U.S. national security. Under this new guidance, we will conduct a comprehensive and thorough vetting, including online presence, of all student and exchange visitor applicants in the F, M, and J nonimmigrant classifications.” The new policy, following the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to begin screening anti-Semitic online activity posted by

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon