Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

What is Extreme Hardship in a Waiver Application?

One way immigrant visa applicants may be eligible for a waiver of a refused immigrant visa is to file a Form I-601 Waiver of Inadmissibility through the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) and  demonstrate that they have a qualifying U.S. relative (spouse or child) and who would suffer “extreme hardship” if the applicant would be prevented from immigrating to the United States.

The term extreme hardship is not defined by statute or regulation but rather is determined subjectively by examining several different factors focused on the qualifying U.S. relative. Some of the factors that may be considered include but are not limited the following:

  • Quality of life in the immigrant visa applicant’s home country if the qualifying U.S. citizen would be required to relocate due to the immigrant visa applicant being unable to immigrate;
  • If the qualifying U.S. citizen has children, educational opportunities if the children would be required to relocate to the immigrant visa applicant’s home country;
  • Psychological impact such as depression as a result of family separation;
  • Health considerations for the qualifying U.S. relative, such as inadequate medical facilities or limited treatment options in the immigrant visa applicant’s home country.

In addition to some of the factors mentioned above, USCIS has identified specific factors that will be considered when evaluating whether a showing of extreme hardship has been established:

  • Financial considerations. This includes the inability for the qualifying U.S. relative to secure employment abroad, the decline of an accustomed standard of living, losses incurred due to a sale of a home or business, or the increased cost of medical care for family members who may be required to relocate with the qualifying U.S. relative abroad.
  • Educational considerations. This includes loss of higher educational opportunities for minor dependents should the children relocate with the qualifying U.S. relative as well as a disruption in the quality of education that the children are receiving in the United States. The USCIS will also look at foreign languages spoken in the country that the qualifying U.S. relative would relocate to and the degree of difficulty of dependent children to learn the language.
  • Health considerations. This includes existing or ongoing treatment for the qualifying U.S. relative whether such treatment is available abroad. Costs associated with such treatment should be viewed under financial considerations.
  • Personal considerations. This includes the qualifying U.S. relative’s ties to the U.S. as well as the ties of any dependent children and other family members who may be required to relocate abroad.
  • Special factors. This includes language, cultural and religious differences in addition to valid fears of persecution, physical harm or social stigma that the qualifying U.S. relative may suffer if required to relocate abroad.

Proving extreme hardship often requires the skills and knowledge of an experienced immigration attorney. For more information, contact us today at info@enterlinepartners.com and speak with a U.S. immigration attorney in Ho Chi Minh City, Manila and Taipei.

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office

Suite 601, 6th Floor, Saigon Tower
29 Le Duan Street
Ben Nghe Ward, District 1
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Tel: +84 933 301 488

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ

Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office

LKG Tower 37th Floor
6801 Ayala Avenue
Makati City, Philippines 1226

Tel: +632 5310 1491

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines

Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

Copyright 2022. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

successful i-130 dcf approval hcmc

Enterline and Partners Succesfully Expedites I-130 Petition with Direct Consular Filing at the U.S. Consulate in Ho Chi Minh City

Enterline and Partners is pleased to announce that our attorneys have successfully represented another client with Direct Consular Filing (“DCF”) of  an I-130 Petition for Alien Relative (“I-130 Petition”) at the U.S. Consulate in Ho Chi Minh City (“Consulate.”) Our clients, a U.S. citizen and Vietnamese citizen, approached us after the U.S. citizen received a job offer which required his immediate relocation back to the United States. Following our consultation session in which we thoroughly discussed how DCF is adjudicated as well as advising that it remains discretionary, the couple decided to proceed and engaged our office to file the initial DCF request. Our team worked diligently in gathering all of the required and supplemental documentation needed before the DCF request could be filed. Once everything was finalized, we submitted the request. Less than a week later, the Consulate approved our DCF request and scheduled the client to file the

Read more >
supreme court

Supreme Court Hands the Trump Administration a Partial Victory in Ongoing Birthright Citizenship Litigation

The United States Supreme Court has given President Donald Trump’s Executive Order (“EO”) curbing birthright citizenship a partial victory. The ruling does not impact “Birthright Citizenship” but rather restricts district court judges from issuing nation-wide (or “universal”) injunctions against Executive Orders.  In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that lower federal court judges who issued nationwide injunctions against the EO went too far and granted the Trump Administration’s request to narrow the injunctions issued in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts. While the Supreme Court’s ruling was a dramatic shift in how lower federal court judges have operated for years, the decision left enough room for challengers to the EO to prevent it from taking effect while litigation works its way through the federal court system. Specifically, the EO, which also suffered a setback by the Federal Court of Appeals will remain blocked for an additional thirty (30) days) allowing the

Read more >
form i0854

When Do Sponsor Obligations End Under Form I-864?

For immigrants to the United States, the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support (“Form I-864”), is a critical part of the family-based immigration process. It is a legally enforceable contract in which a sponsor agrees to financially support the intended immigrant, helping ensure that the immigrant does not rely on certain U.S. government benefits after becoming a permanent resident. By signing Form I-864, the sponsor takes on long-term financial responsibility, but this obligation is not indefinite. The U.S. government outlines specific situations under which the sponsor’s duties come to an end. When Will These Obligations End?  A sponsors obligations under a Form I-864 end when the sponsored immigrant: A sponsor’s obligations under a Form I-864 also end if the sponsor dies. As such, the sponsor’s estate is not required to take responsibility for the sponsored immigrant following the sponsor’s death. Divorce does not terminate the responsibility, and if the sponsor dies,

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon