Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Partial Investments in the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program

The EB-5 immigrant investor regulations allow an investor to make a partial investment at the time of filing the Form I-526 and Form I-526E, Immigrant Petition by an Investor and to make the remaining investment at a later date.  This is confirmed by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) Policy Manual guidance at least with regard to the use of a promissory note in connection with the partial investment.

Under the regulations governing EB-5 investments at 8 CFR § 204.6 “Petitions for employment creation immigrants”, the clause “actively in the process of investing” appears 7 times.

(j) Initial evidence to accompany petition.

(2) To show that the petitioner has invested or is actively in the process of investing the required amount of capital, the petition must be accompanied by evidence that the petitioner has placed the required amount of capital at risk for the purpose of generating a return on the capital placed at risk. Evidence of mere intent to invest, or of prospective investment arrangements entailing no present commitment, will not suffice to show that the petitioner is actively in the process of investing. The alien must show actual commitment of the required amount of capital. Such evidence may include, but need not be limited to:

(v) Evidence of any loan or mortgage agreement, promissory note, security agreement, or other evidence of borrowing which is secured by assets of the petitioner, other than those of the new commercial enterprise, and for which the petitioner is personally and primarily liable.

If an EB-5 investor’s Form I-526 and Form I-526E, Immigrant Petition by an investor (“Petition”) includes a promissory note, it should be issued for the benefit of the New Commercial Enterprise (“NCE”) into which the investor is investing and secured with the capital, or assets, pledged for the investment, and that allows the NCE to seize, or take, the capital.

The USCIS Policy Manual provides guidance on the procedures and use of promissory notes at Volume 6 – Immigrants, Part G – Investors, Chapter 2 – Eligibility Requirements:

“A. Investment of Capital

Promissory Notes

Capital can include the immigrant investor’s promise to pay (a promissory note), as long as the immigrant investor is personally and primarily liable for the promissory note debt and his or her assets adequately secure the note. Any security interest must be perfected to the extent provided for by the jurisdiction in which the asset is located. Further, the assets securing the promissory note:

  • Cannot include assets of the company in which the immigrant is investing;
  • Must be specifically identified as securing the promissory note; and
  • Must be fully amenable to seizure by a U.S. noteholder.

The fair market value of a promissory note depends on its present value, not the value at any different time. In addition, to qualify as capital, nearly all of the money due under a promissory note must be payable within 2 years, without provisions for extensions.”

Of the above three bullet point requirements, the third will be the most challenging for an investor and a NCE to meet.  Most likely, an investor’s capital will be located outside of the U.S., creating challenges for the NCE to perfect a security interest that is enforceable by the NCE in a foreign country.

Alternatively, it can be argued that the regulations that permit an investor to be “actively in the process of investing” do not expressly require a promissory note, and additional language in the regulations suggest this to be allowed.

Under (j)(2)(iv):

“Evidence of monies transferred or committed to be transferred to the new commercial enterprise in exchange for shares of stock (voting or nonvoting, common or preferred). Such stock may not include terms requiring the new commercial enterprise to redeem it at the holder’s request;”

This clearly indicates that money (capital) can remain committed to be transferred and all capital is not required to be transferred by the time an investor files his or her I-526 Petition.  This is supported by comments made by then USCIS Investor Program Office Chief Sarah Kendall at the 2019 IIUSA EB-5 Industry Forum:

“Petitioners must show actual commitment of the required amount of capital and do not need to have completed their investment before the effective date of the new rule, but may continue to be actively in the process of investing the minimum investment amount required under the current rule.”

Chief Kendall then provided an example, and concluded: “I want to emphasize, however, that investors must be eligible at the time of filing and the failure to have identified and committed the full amount of capital at the time of filing does not establish eligibility under applicable requirements.”  These comments were directed at the pending increase to the minimum investment amounts to be implemented by the “EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program Modernization Rule” on November 19, 2019.

What the USCIS will consider as “committed capital” may be up for debate.  An investor that chooses to make a partial investment at the time of filing his or her Petition should expect that without a promissory note, the USCIS will issue a request for evidence at the time of reviewing the investor’s Petition and request evidence of “commitment”, and at that time, the investor should be prepared to remit the remaining portion of the capital within the period of time required by the request.

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office

Suite 601, 6th Floor, Saigon Tower
29 Le Duan Street
Ben Nghe Ward, District 1
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Tel: +84 933 301 488

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ

Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office

LKG Tower 37th Floor
6801 Ayala Avenue
Makati City, Philippines 1226

Tel: +632 5310 1491

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines

Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

Copyright 2022. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

successful i-130 dcf approval hcmc

Enterline and Partners Succesfully Expedites I-130 Petition with Direct Consular Filing at the U.S. Consulate in Ho Chi Minh City

Enterline and Partners is pleased to announce that our attorneys have successfully represented another client with Direct Consular Filing (“DCF”) of  an I-130 Petition for Alien Relative (“I-130 Petition”) at the U.S. Consulate in Ho Chi Minh City (“Consulate.”) Our clients, a U.S. citizen and Vietnamese citizen, approached us after the U.S. citizen received a job offer which required his immediate relocation back to the United States. Following our consultation session in which we thoroughly discussed how DCF is adjudicated as well as advising that it remains discretionary, the couple decided to proceed and engaged our office to file the initial DCF request. Our team worked diligently in gathering all of the required and supplemental documentation needed before the DCF request could be filed. Once everything was finalized, we submitted the request. Less than a week later, the Consulate approved our DCF request and scheduled the client to file the

Read more >
supreme court

Supreme Court Hands the Trump Administration a Partial Victory in Ongoing Birthright Citizenship Litigation

The United States Supreme Court has given President Donald Trump’s Executive Order (“EO”) curbing birthright citizenship a partial victory. The ruling does not impact “Birthright Citizenship” but rather restricts district court judges from issuing nation-wide (or “universal”) injunctions against Executive Orders.  In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that lower federal court judges who issued nationwide injunctions against the EO went too far and granted the Trump Administration’s request to narrow the injunctions issued in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts. While the Supreme Court’s ruling was a dramatic shift in how lower federal court judges have operated for years, the decision left enough room for challengers to the EO to prevent it from taking effect while litigation works its way through the federal court system. Specifically, the EO, which also suffered a setback by the Federal Court of Appeals will remain blocked for an additional thirty (30) days) allowing the

Read more >
form i0854

When Do Sponsor Obligations End Under Form I-864?

For immigrants to the United States, the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support (“Form I-864”), is a critical part of the family-based immigration process. It is a legally enforceable contract in which a sponsor agrees to financially support the intended immigrant, helping ensure that the immigrant does not rely on certain U.S. government benefits after becoming a permanent resident. By signing Form I-864, the sponsor takes on long-term financial responsibility, but this obligation is not indefinite. The U.S. government outlines specific situations under which the sponsor’s duties come to an end. When Will These Obligations End?  A sponsors obligations under a Form I-864 end when the sponsored immigrant: A sponsor’s obligations under a Form I-864 also end if the sponsor dies. As such, the sponsor’s estate is not required to take responsibility for the sponsored immigrant following the sponsor’s death. Divorce does not terminate the responsibility, and if the sponsor dies,

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon