Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Search
Close this search box.

Has Trump Finally Overstepped His Abuse of Executive Authority?

Editor’s Note: this article was written after the lawsuit discussed herein but not published before the DHS indicated to the Federal Court judge on July 14th that it would rescind the policy.

In a recent American Immigration Lawyers Association (“AILA”) webinar, the esteemed Ira Kurzban, unquestionably regarded as the godfather of immigration litigation, commented that every single day of Trump’s administration, he has made some change to law or regulation by issuing Executive Orders or directives or by other means.  This is most evident and publicized in his attack on legal immigration, circumventing the laws and regulations passed by Congress that provide for an organized necessary immigration system.  That the GOP has allowed him to do so without check is telling of how far to the right the Republican party has swung.  But Trump may have finally overstepped his authority.

Last week the United States Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) announced a new policy prohibiting foreign students from studying in the United States if a college or university shifted to full-time online classes because of the COVID-19 pandemic.  Foreign students in the U.S. on F-1 and M-1 visas enrolled in any institution that moved all its classes online would be required to leave the United States.  Immediately Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology sued in federal court to try to block this policy.  On July 13th attorneys general in 17 states and the District of Columbia filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration over this same policy, including a request for an injunction to stop the policy from becoming effective while the case is being considered by the court.

Forcing foreign students to leave the U.S. could have a significant economic impact on the United States. According to the Institute of International Education, the total foreign student population reached 1.1 million in the 2018- 2019 academic year and comprised roughly 5.5 percent of the total higher education community. The U.S. Department of Commerce noted that foreign students contributed nearly $45 billion to the 2018 U.S. economy as well as offering cultural diversity to campus life and enriching academics in many ways.

The lawsuit is based on several key factors. The directive was arbitrary and capricious because it failed to offer a reason for its reversal of prior policy, the rule imposes large financial and administrative burdens on colleges and universities, and the directive would interfere with reopening guidelines that state governments have already issued.

Initially filed by the state of Massachusetts, 16 other states joined the lawsuit and includes declarations from more than 40 schools impacted by the policy, including the University of Massachusetts, Boston University, Yale, the University of Connecticut, and Tufts University.

Lawsuits filed against Trump’s policies and executive orders are ubiquitous.  It is possible that almost every single order or policy change that he has made has resulted in a lawsuit.  But in the field of legal immigration, an organized challenge by a significant number of states is notable.  With fall semesters scheduled to begin in as little as 5 to 7 weeks, foreign students in the U.S. and those institutions that rely on such students urgently need an injunction to ensure stability to all parties during the resolution of this lawsuit.

If you have questions about the policy or the lawsuit, or what you as a foreign student can do to protect your status, contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com and speak with one of our U.S. immigration lawyers in Ho Chi Minh City, Manila and Taipei.

 

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office
Suite 601, 6th Floor
Saigon Tower
29 Le Duan Street
Ben Nghe Ward, District 1
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Tel: +84 933 301 488
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com
Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ
Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office
Unit 2507 Cityland 10 Tower 1
156 H.V. Dela Costa Street
Makati City, Philippines 1209
Tel: +632 5310 1491
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com
Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines
Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

Copyright 2020. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.
CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

Federal Lawsuit Filed Immediately Following Trump’s Executive Order Ending Birthright Citizenship

Less than 2 hours after President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order (“EO”) attempting to end birthright citizenship, immigrant advocates started to file lawsuits in Federal Court attempting to block Trump’s Executive Order. The first lawsuit was filed in the U.S. Federal District Court of New Hampshire  on behalf of a group representing Indonesian migrants in the State. It was signed by a total of twenty-six (26) attorneys representing the American Civil Liberties Union, State Democracy Defends Fund, the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Endowment Fund, League of United Latin American Citizens and Make the Road New York as plaintiffs. Following New Hampshire, more than two dozen additional lawsuits were filed against the EO in Federal District Courts contending that the EO violates the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment, U.S. Supreme Court precedent since 1898 (United States v. Wong Kim Ark), as well as federal law which has been practiced

Read more >

Can My Fiance Work in the U.S. After Arriving on a K-1 Visa?

One your fiance arrives in the United States on a K-1 visa and you are married within ninety (90) days upon arrival, you and your fiance will need to file for adjustment of status with the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) in order to convert the K-1 fiance nonimmigrant visa status to lawful permanent resident status. As part of the adjustment process, applicants have the option of filing a Form I-131, Application for Travel Documents, Parole Documents, and Arrival/ Departure Records with their Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status. Approval of the Form I-131 will result in Advance Parole allowing for international travel while waiting for USCIS to approve the Form I-485. Applicants also have the option to file a Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization (“EAD”) while USCIS adjudicates the adjustment application. Once the EAD is approved, they will have valid status and

Read more >

What is the Four Month Validity Period of an Approved I-129F Petition for a K-1 Visa?

Once the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) approves an I-129F Petition for Alien Fiancé, the foreign fiancé typically has four (4) months to apply for a K-1 fiancé visa at a U.S. Embassy or Consulate. However, due to the time that it takes for an approved petition to be sent and received by the National Visa Center and then forwarded to the foreign fiancé’s embassy or consulate where he/she will undergo a visa interview, petition revalidation is possible. While the interviewing consular officer will often automatically revalidate an expired petition, demonstrating ongoing intent that the U.S. citizen and foreign fiancé intend to marry within ninety (90) days upon the foreign fiancé’s arrival in the United States may be requested. The rationale behind requesting updated documentation showing continued marital intent is to ensure that the couple’s bona-fide relationship remains current and genuine. It further helps to reduce prolonged processing

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon