Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Search
Close this search box.

New Increased USCIS Filing Fees for EB-5 Investors

Update: Between the writing and publication of this article, a federal judge granted a motion for a preliminary injunction against the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) fee rule discussed herein.  As long as this preliminary injunction is in place, the existing fees remain as before.

Effective October 2, 2020, all EB-5 investors will need to pay more to file Form I-526 Petitions and Form I-829 Petitions pursuant to a proposed rule by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”). The increase to the petitions in the EB-5 visa category is part of a comprehensive increase to petitions, applications and other benefits proposed by USCIS in August 2020.

The new fee for the I-526 Immigrant Petition by Alien Investor will rise to $4,010 from the previous fee of $3,675.

The new fee for the I-829 Petition by Investor to Remove Conditions on Permanent Residence Status will rise to $3,900 from the previous fee of $3,750.

All petitions postmarked on or after October 2, 2020 must include the new increased fees as established by the final USCIS fee rule.

According to USCIS, the increased fees are a result of increased costs to adjudicate immigration benefit requests, detect and deter immigration fraud, and thoroughly vet applicants, petitioners and beneficiaries. The rule also supports payroll, technology and operations to accomplish the USCIS mission.

EB-5 stakeholders such as the American Immigration Lawyers Association (“AILA”) and the American Immigration Council (“AIC”) submitted comments in response to the proposed rule. In a joint statement submitted to USCIS, AILA and AIC opposed the proposed fee increases noting that if implemented as written, the proposed rule would require customers to pay increased fees for decreased services.  In recent years, USCIS case processing has slowed dramatically, due in significant part to the agency’s own inefficient policies, especially in the EB-5 visa category.  Currently, USCIS reports adjudication times for I-526 petitions at 37 to 73.5 months and I-829 petitions at 28.5 to 51.5 months.

Two lawsuits have been filed against the USCIS challenging key components of the final rule and requesting a preliminary injunction enjoining (stopping) implementation of the rule.  If the implementation of the fee rule is enjoined, it is likely that USCIS will be required to continue to use its current fee schedule and accept current versions of all forms.  However, if the court does not grant the injunction, EB-5 investors must be prepared to file petitions consistent with the new fee rule.

For more information on the fee increases in the EB-5 visa category or any other visa category fee increase, contact one of our immigration lawyers in Asia.

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office

Suite 601, 6th Floor, Saigon Tower
29 Le Duan Street
Ben Nghe Ward, District 1
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Tel: +84 933 301 488

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ

Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office

Unit 2507 Cityland 10 Tower 1
156 H.V. Dela Costa Street
Makati City, Philippines 1209

Tel: +632 5310 1491

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines

Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

Copyright 2020. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

Supreme Court Hands the Trump Administration a Partial Victory in Ongoing Birthright Citizenship Litigation

The United States Supreme Court has given President Donald Trump’s Executive Order (“EO”) curbing birthright citizenship a partial victory. The ruling does not impact “Birthright Citizenship” but rather restricts district court judges from issuing nation-wide (or “universal”) injunctions against Executive Orders.  In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that lower federal court judges who issued nationwide injunctions against the EO went too far and granted the Trump Administration’s request to narrow the injunctions issued in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts. While the Supreme Court’s ruling was a dramatic shift in how lower federal court judges have operated for years, the decision left enough room for challengers to the EO to prevent it from taking effect while litigation works its way through the federal court system. Specifically, the EO, which also suffered a setback by the Federal Court of Appeals will remain blocked for an additional thirty (30) days) allowing the

Read more >

When Do Sponsor Obligations End Under Form I-864?

For immigrants to the United States, the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support (“Form I-864”), is a critical part of the family-based immigration process. It is a legally enforceable contract in which a sponsor agrees to financially support the intended immigrant, helping ensure that the immigrant does not rely on certain U.S. government benefits after becoming a permanent resident. By signing Form I-864, the sponsor takes on long-term financial responsibility, but this obligation is not indefinite. The U.S. government outlines specific situations under which the sponsor’s duties come to an end. When Will These Obligations End?  A sponsors obligations under a Form I-864 end when the sponsored immigrant: A sponsor’s obligations under a Form I-864 also end if the sponsor dies. As such, the sponsor’s estate is not required to take responsibility for the sponsored immigrant following the sponsor’s death. Divorce does not terminate the responsibility, and if the sponsor dies,

Read more >

F, M and J Student Visa Interviews to Resume with Enhanced Social Media Vetting

The United States Department of State (“DOS”) has instructed Embassies and Consulates to begin accepting new F, M, and J student visa application appointments following a temporary suspension. The pause was initiated to allow DOS to implement policy changes regarding social media vetting. After the suspension, e F, M, and J student visa applicants are required to make their social media accounts public for vetting purposes. In a DOS announcement, DOS will use all information available for “visa screening and vetting to identify visa applicants who are inadmissible to the United States, including those who pose a threat to U.S. national security. Under this new guidance, we will conduct a comprehensive and thorough vetting, including online presence, of all student and exchange visitor applicants in the F, M, and J nonimmigrant classifications.” The new policy, following the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to begin screening anti-Semitic online activity posted by

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon