Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Search
Close this search box.

Partial Investments in the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program

The EB-5 immigrant investor regulations allow an investor to make a partial investment at the time of filing the Form I-526 and Form I-526E, Immigrant Petition by an Investor and to make the remaining investment at a later date.  This is confirmed by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) Policy Manual guidance at least with regard to the use of a promissory note in connection with the partial investment.

Under the regulations governing EB-5 investments at 8 CFR § 204.6 “Petitions for employment creation immigrants”, the clause “actively in the process of investing” appears 7 times.

(j) Initial evidence to accompany petition.

(2) To show that the petitioner has invested or is actively in the process of investing the required amount of capital, the petition must be accompanied by evidence that the petitioner has placed the required amount of capital at risk for the purpose of generating a return on the capital placed at risk. Evidence of mere intent to invest, or of prospective investment arrangements entailing no present commitment, will not suffice to show that the petitioner is actively in the process of investing. The alien must show actual commitment of the required amount of capital. Such evidence may include, but need not be limited to:

(v) Evidence of any loan or mortgage agreement, promissory note, security agreement, or other evidence of borrowing which is secured by assets of the petitioner, other than those of the new commercial enterprise, and for which the petitioner is personally and primarily liable.

If an EB-5 investor’s Form I-526 and Form I-526E, Immigrant Petition by an investor (“Petition”) includes a promissory note, it should be issued for the benefit of the New Commercial Enterprise (“NCE”) into which the investor is investing and secured with the capital, or assets, pledged for the investment, and that allows the NCE to seize, or take, the capital.

The USCIS Policy Manual provides guidance on the procedures and use of promissory notes at Volume 6 – Immigrants, Part G – Investors, Chapter 2 – Eligibility Requirements:

“A. Investment of Capital

Promissory Notes

Capital can include the immigrant investor’s promise to pay (a promissory note), as long as the immigrant investor is personally and primarily liable for the promissory note debt and his or her assets adequately secure the note. Any security interest must be perfected to the extent provided for by the jurisdiction in which the asset is located. Further, the assets securing the promissory note:

  • Cannot include assets of the company in which the immigrant is investing;
  • Must be specifically identified as securing the promissory note; and
  • Must be fully amenable to seizure by a U.S. noteholder.

The fair market value of a promissory note depends on its present value, not the value at any different time. In addition, to qualify as capital, nearly all of the money due under a promissory note must be payable within 2 years, without provisions for extensions.”

Of the above three bullet point requirements, the third will be the most challenging for an investor and a NCE to meet.  Most likely, an investor’s capital will be located outside of the U.S., creating challenges for the NCE to perfect a security interest that is enforceable by the NCE in a foreign country.

Alternatively, it can be argued that the regulations that permit an investor to be “actively in the process of investing” do not expressly require a promissory note, and additional language in the regulations suggest this to be allowed.

Under (j)(2)(iv):

“Evidence of monies transferred or committed to be transferred to the new commercial enterprise in exchange for shares of stock (voting or nonvoting, common or preferred). Such stock may not include terms requiring the new commercial enterprise to redeem it at the holder’s request;”

This clearly indicates that money (capital) can remain committed to be transferred and all capital is not required to be transferred by the time an investor files his or her I-526 Petition.  This is supported by comments made by then USCIS Investor Program Office Chief Sarah Kendall at the 2019 IIUSA EB-5 Industry Forum:

“Petitioners must show actual commitment of the required amount of capital and do not need to have completed their investment before the effective date of the new rule, but may continue to be actively in the process of investing the minimum investment amount required under the current rule.”

Chief Kendall then provided an example, and concluded: “I want to emphasize, however, that investors must be eligible at the time of filing and the failure to have identified and committed the full amount of capital at the time of filing does not establish eligibility under applicable requirements.”  These comments were directed at the pending increase to the minimum investment amounts to be implemented by the “EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program Modernization Rule” on November 19, 2019.

What the USCIS will consider as “committed capital” may be up for debate.  An investor that chooses to make a partial investment at the time of filing his or her Petition should expect that without a promissory note, the USCIS will issue a request for evidence at the time of reviewing the investor’s Petition and request evidence of “commitment”, and at that time, the investor should be prepared to remit the remaining portion of the capital within the period of time required by the request.

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office

Suite 601, 6th Floor, Saigon Tower
29 Le Duan Street
Ben Nghe Ward, District 1
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Tel: +84 933 301 488

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ

Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office

LKG Tower 37th Floor
6801 Ayala Avenue
Makati City, Philippines 1226

Tel: +632 5310 1491

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines

Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

Copyright 2022. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

Delinquent U.S. Taxpayers in Southeast Asia

While living in the Southeast Asian region, it’s easy to forget about U.S. tax obligations, especially if the taxpayer’s income is deemed “minimal.”  Let’s first re-visit our tax filing requirements, where an excerpt is noted right on the last page of one’s U.S. Passport, “All U.S. Citizens working and residing abroad are required to file and report on their worldwide income. Consult IRS Publication 54 …” Tax practitioners may use the standard deduction as the filing threshold. For tax year 2024, single status filers can claim up to $14,600 as a standard deduction. Therefore, if one can maintain and produce supporting documentation that the tax year’s income is below the standard deduction threshold, the taxpayer may opt to not file a U.S. Income Tax Return. However, it’s good practice to still file a tax return  to show the U.S. Internal Revenue Service that your income is below the standard deduction

Read more >

Federal Court of Appeals Rules Against Trump’s EO Ending Birthright Citizenship

A Federal Court of Appeals handed the Trump Administration another blow in its fight to redefine the 14th Amendment ending birthright citizenship through Executive Order (“EO”). The San Francisco-based Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the Administration’s request for an emergency order putting on hold a nationwide ban issued by Seattle-based Judge John Coughenour last month who found the EO blatantly unconstitutional. Judge Coughenour decision was swiftly followed by Judge Deborah Boardman’s decision in Maryland who also ruled that the EO needed to be stopped. While the Trump Administration argued that Judge Coughenour’s ruling went too far, a three-judge panel disagreed and scheduled the case for arguments in June. U.S. Circuit Judge Danielle Forrest, whom Trump appointed during his first term, said that a rapid decision would risk eroding public confidence in judges who must “reach their decisions apart from ideology or political preference.” The other judges on the panel,

Read more >

U.S. Taxes for Americans Abroad

A common concern raised by our clients departing the United States to reside abroad is what do they need to do about U.S. taxes. Furthermore, there are several misconceptions and misunderstandings that permeate the American expatriate community about U.S. taxes; especially about filing thresholds and some exclusion amounts. Allow us to provide insights — answers to address these questions and clarify the misconceptions. U.S. taxes are the financial backbone of the U.S. economy. The tax system is essential to financing the activities of the federal, state and municipal governments including infrastructure, healthcare, education, military and consular services. Indeed, now a cliché, founding father Benjamin Franklin once said, “nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.” Another notable thing about U.S. taxes is that an excerpt is noted right on the last page of one’s U.S. Passport, “All U.S. Citizens working and residing abroad are required to file

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon