Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Search
Close this search box.

Persons from Hong Kong Not Yet Subject to China Visa Allocation

At a recent IIUSA EB-5 Forum, Charles Oppenheim, the Chief of the Visa Control and Reporting Division at the U.S. Department of State (“DOS”) – the man who decides the DOS Visa Bulletin every month – responded to a question regarding visa allocation for persons from Hong Kong.

The question was “are EB-5 applicants from Hong Kong now considered in the same category as mainland-born Chinese?” Oppenheim answered that at this time Hong Kong is still treated as a separate foreign state for immigrant visa purposes. This is good news for EB-5 investors and all other persons from Hong Kong who are eligible for immigrant visas because based on average processing times, Hong Kong applicants can expect to obtain their EB-5 visas in 24 to 30 months.

Not so for Chinese EB-5 investors who will continue to be subjected to prolonged waiting periods. The EB-5 visa category has an annual quota of approximately 10,000 visas. Once the annual quota is reached, each country may only take 7% of the visas from the EB-5 visa category. Because of high demand from China for many U.S. immigrant visa categories, Oppenheim estimated that if a Chinese investor files an I-526 Petition (as of November 19th, 2020), he or she may need to wait 17.2 years for the visa to become available.

On June 30, 2020, the People’s Republic of China passed the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, more commonly known as the Hong Kong National Security Law, as a direct response to ongoing protests in Hong Kong. In response, on July 14, 2020, President Trump signed the Hong Kong Autonomy Act of 2020 (“Act”) and at the same time signed The President’s Executive Order on Hong Kong Normalization. The intent of the Executive Order (“EO”) was to suspend or eliminate different and preferential treatment for Hong Kong, including the treatment of Hong Kong persons as separate from China nationals under the U.S. immigration laws.  Later review of the Act and the EO raised questions whether the President’s Act and the EO altered U.S. immigration law in this manner.

Until now, DOS has not issued further guidance on the reallocation of Hong Kong persons to mainland China. Other comments from Department of State officials suggest that this is not forthcoming.  With a new presidential administration coming into power in just a few months, it seems unlikely that this proposed change will take effect.

If you have questions about the status of Hong Kong persons and allocation of immigrant visas, contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com and speak with a U.S. immigration attorney based in Ho Chi Minh City, Manila and Taipei. Our immigration attorneys have over three decades of experience assisting clients at the U.S. Consulates thorough Asia.
.

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office

Suite 601, 6th Floor, Saigon Tower
29 Le Duan Street
Ben Nghe Ward, District 1
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Tel: +84 933 301 488

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ

Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office

Unit 2507 Cityland 10 Tower 1
156 H.V. Dela Costa Street
Makati City, Philippines 1209

Tel: +632 5310 1491

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines

Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

Copyright 2020. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

What Is Adjustment Of Status For U.S. Immigration Purposes?

Under U.S. immigration law, Adjustment of Status (“AOS”) refers to the process through which an individual who is already in the United States applies to change their immigration status from that of a nonimmigrant visa status to that of an immigrant visa status, or “Lawful Permanent Residence”. This process is typically pursued by individuals who entered the U.S. legally on a temporary basis as a nonimmigrant and later decide to stay permanently.  One of the best examples is when a student on F-1 status to attend a four year bachelor degree program is offered a job and qualifies at the end of their studies. They may then be eligible for Adjustment of Status. All AOS Applicants must fulfill certain qualifying requirements in order to apply for Adjustment of Status. They must have entered the U.S. lawfully, such as with a valid nonimmigrant visa and be physically present in the United

Read more >

Delinquent U.S. Taxpayers in Southeast Asia

While living in the Southeast Asian region, it’s easy to forget about U.S. tax obligations, especially if the taxpayer’s income is deemed “minimal.”  Let’s first re-visit our tax filing requirements, where an excerpt is noted right on the last page of one’s U.S. Passport, “All U.S. Citizens working and residing abroad are required to file and report on their worldwide income. Consult IRS Publication 54 …” Tax practitioners may use the standard deduction as the filing threshold. For tax year 2024, single status filers can claim up to $14,600 as a standard deduction. Therefore, if one can maintain and produce supporting documentation that the tax year’s income is below the standard deduction threshold, the taxpayer may opt to not file a U.S. Income Tax Return. However, it’s good practice to still file a tax return  to show the U.S. Internal Revenue Service that your income is below the standard deduction

Read more >

Federal Court of Appeals Rules Against Trump’s EO Ending Birthright Citizenship

A Federal Court of Appeals handed the Trump Administration another blow in its fight to redefine the 14th Amendment ending birthright citizenship through Executive Order (“EO”). The San Francisco-based Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the Administration’s request for an emergency order putting on hold a nationwide ban issued by Seattle-based Judge John Coughenour last month who found the EO blatantly unconstitutional. Judge Coughenour decision was swiftly followed by Judge Deborah Boardman’s decision in Maryland who also ruled that the EO needed to be stopped. While the Trump Administration argued that Judge Coughenour’s ruling went too far, a three-judge panel disagreed and scheduled the case for arguments in June. U.S. Circuit Judge Danielle Forrest, whom Trump appointed during his first term, said that a rapid decision would risk eroding public confidence in judges who must “reach their decisions apart from ideology or political preference.” The other judges on the panel,

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon