Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Search
Close this search box.

U.S. District Court Rules to Overturn EB-5 Regulations; Investment Amount Reduced to $500,000 – for Now.

On June 22, 2021, Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of California issued an order granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Behring Regional Center, in the lawsuit Behring filed against the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”).  The order was given in the matter of Behring Regional Center LLC V. Chad Wolf, et al.

Behring Regional Center filed the lawsuit against the DHS challenging whether the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Chad Wolf, had been legally appointed to his position at the time the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program Modernization regulation (the “EB-5 Regulation”) came into effect on November 21, 2019.

Under the EB-5 Regulation, the most important change to the program was the increase in the minimum investment amount from $500,000 to $900,000 for investments made in a Targeted Employment Areas that qualify for this lower investment amount.

In its lawsuit, Behring requested the Court to issue a judgment that the EB-5 Regulation is vacated (no longer valid) because acting Secretary Wolf was not lawfully serving in his role at the time the final rule was issued. The Court agreed and set aside the EB-5 Regulation and has remanded the matter back to the Department of Homeland Security.

Behring also requested the Court to issue an injunction barring the current, properly appointment Secretary of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, from reinstating the EB-5 Regulation for a period of 180 days.  The Court denied this request.

As of right now, the EB-5 Regulation is no longer the law of the EB-5 immigrant visa program.  How long this will last is uncertain.

The DHS could file an appeal with a Court of Appeals and also request its own injunction to stop the District Court’s decision from taking affect pending the appeal process. If the higher Court approves such an injunction, the EB-5 Regulation will remain in place. Whether it does or not, the DHS is likely to move quickly to reauthorize the EB-5 Regulation by following the proper procedures under the Administrative Procedures Act.  This process might take 60 to 90 days or longer.

For investors who have been considering EB-5 as a way to immigrate to the U.S. and want to take advantage of the lower investment amount of $500,000 should move quickly to file their EB-5 petitions before this window of opportunity closes and should also understand the potential risks of filing an EB-5 I-526 Petition under this time of uncertainty.

Update: The EB-5 Regional Center Program Will Lapse on June 30, 2021

For more information, please contact us today at info@enterlinepartners.com and speak with a U.S. immigration attorney in Ho Chi Minh City, Manila, and Taipei.

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office

Suite 601, 6th Floor, Saigon Tower
29 Le Duan Street
Ben Nghe Ward, District 1
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Tel: +84 933 301 488

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ

Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office

LKG Tower 37th Floor
6801 Ayala Avenue
Makati City, Philippines 1226

Tel: +632 5310 1491

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines

Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

Copyright 2021. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

What is a Joint Sponsor for a Form I-864 Affidavit of Support?

A Joint Sponsor for Form I-864, Affidavit of Support, is an individual who agrees to share the financial responsibility for sponsoring an immigrant when the primary sponsor (the Petitioner) does not meet the minimum income requirements. The joint sponsor must meet certain eligibility criteria and file their own Form I-864 in addition to the primary sponsor’s form. What is the Eligibility Criteria for a Joint Sponsor? No Obligation to Be Related: Unlike the primary sponsor, the joint sponsor does not need to be related to the immigrant. What are the Responsibilities of a Joint Sponsor? When signing Form I-864, the joint sponsor agrees to: What Are the Filing Process for a Joint Sponsor? Multiple joint sponsors may be involved if needed. Each joint sponsor however must independently meet the income requirements for their own household size and file their own I-864. For more information, please contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com. ENTERLINE

Read more >

President-Elect Trump’s Mass Deportation Begins to Take Hold

During the 2024 campaign,  former president and candidate Donald J. Trump promised mass deportation for millions on undocumented migrants in the United States. It appears that the campaign pledges are beginning to take hold. Last week, President-elect Trump named Thomas Homan as the “Border Tsar.” Homan, a former police officer and immigration official who previously served during the Obama administration and the first Trump administration as Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director has made it clear that mass deportation will be effectively carried out. “We have a mandate. I think the American people just gave President Trump a mandate. That’s why he’s elected – to secure the border, save lives, and deport people, especially national security threats and public safety threats,” said Homan. Homan commented that the immediate focus will be those in the country illegally with criminal convictions or charges. “It’s not going to be a massive sweep of neighborhoods.

Read more >

Federal Judge Strikes Down Parole-in-Place Program

A U.S. Federal Court Judge has struck down Parole-in-Place following an earlier decision granting the State of Texas and fifteen (15) other states an administrative stay two months ago. Judge J. Campbell Barker of the Eastern District of Texas ruled that the program, which would fast-track permanent residency to certain undocumented immigrants to obtain lawful permanent residents who are spouses and stepchildren of U.S. citizens, “exceeded its statutory authority and is not in accordance with the law.”  Judge Barker further added that the program “focuses on the wrong thing, in identifying ‘significant public benefits’- the benefits of aliens’ new legal status – rather than their presence in the country.”  At the time of publishing this article, it is unclear whether the Biden Administration will appeal Judge Barker’s ruling.  For more information on this ruling, please contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com. ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING    Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office    146C7

Read more >