Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

U.S. Federal Court Judge Temporarily Blocks Presidential Proclamation on Requiring Immigrants to Obtain Health Insurance

A U.S. Federal District Court judge has granted a temporary restraining order (TRO) against U.S. President Donald Trump’s proclamation requiring intending immigrants to obtain health insurance within thirty (30) days upon their arrival in the United States or be able to show that they have enough money to pay for “reasonably foreseeable medical costs.”

Judge Michael Simon of the U.S. District Court of Oregon issued a 28-day TRO which prevented the rule from taking effect on November 3, 2019. The lawsuit, filed by several advocacy groups to block the incoming law argued that the proclamation could prevent hundreds of thousands of prospective immigrants from entering the United States.

In his 18-page order, Judge Simon wrote that the potential damage to immigrants and their families justified the TRO. “Facing a likely risk of being separated from their family members and a delay in obtaining a visa to which family members would otherwise be entitled is irreparable harm,” the order stated.

Trump’s proclamation requiring incoming immigrants to obtain health insurance out of concern that they would not be able to pay for their medical expenses appears to be at odds with healthcare policy experts. According to Leighton Ku, director of the Center of Health Policy Research at the George Washington University, recent immigrants without issuance accounted for less than one-tenth of 1 percent of U.S. medical expenditures in 2017.

 

For more information, contact us at

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING
Ad: 3F, IBC building, 1A Cong Truong Me Linh Str, District 1, HCMC.
Tel: 0933 301 488
CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

contact us today for more information

Latest News

Understanding Form I-864A: Contract Between Household Member and Sponsor

For many family-based immigrants applying for a Green Card, a key step in the process is the submission of Form I-864, Affidavit of Support (“I-864”). This is a legally binding contract in which the sponsoring family member (“Sponsor”) agrees to financially support the intending immigrant (“Beneficiary”). However, in some cases, the “Sponsor” alone may not have sufficient income or assets to meet the required financial support threshold. That is where Form I-864A, Contract Between Sponsor and Household Member (“Form I-864A”) comes into play. A Form I-864A,  is used when a household member—such as a spouse, adult child, parent, or other relative residing at the same address—agrees to combine their income with the Sponsors to meet the minimum financial requirement. The household member must be willing to commit to support the Beneficiary alongside the Sponsor by signing the Form I-864A. It is important to understand the difference between the I-864 and

Read more >

Are K-1 Fiancé(e) Visas Affected by Trump’s 2025 Immigration Policies?

With the return of the Trump administration in 2025, many couples are asking the critical question: “Are K-1 Fiancé(e) visas (hereinafter “fianc(é)”)   affected by Trump’s new immigration policies?” While there is currently no outright ban on K-1 fianc(é) visas, applicants should be prepared for significant changes in processing, increased scrutiny, and potential delays. Following the precedents set during Trump’s previous term and recent executive orders in early 2025, the landscape for family-based immigration, including the K-1 visa, is shifting. Understanding these changes is vital for a successful application. Current Status of K-1 Visas in 2025 As of now, the K-1 fianc(é) visa program remains active. It has not been suspended. However, the administration’s focus on heightened security and “extreme vetting” is already impacting how these visas are processed. Unlike immigrant visas, K-1 visas are technically classified as nonimmigrant visas by the Department of State, even though they are treated

Read more >

Infrastructure Project, Rural Area, And Targeted Employment Area In The RIA

In the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 (“RIA”), three important terms are Infrastructure Project, Rural Area, and Targeted Employment Area (“TEA”). Here’s a clear explanation of each: Infrastructure Project An infrastructure project refers to a capital investment project administered by a governmental entity, such as a federal, state, or local agency. It typically involves a job-creating entity that works with a new commercial enterprise to receive capital investments from EB-5 investors. These projects are characteristically for improving public infrastructure with the added benefit of creating jobs and helping to stimulate local economic growth. Rural Area According to EB-5 regulation, areas that are within the geographic boundaries of a metropolitan statistical area are not eligible for the rural area designation, ensuring that the rural area classification is applied to regions that outside metropolitan zones and truly rural. A Rural Area excludes areas within the boundaries of cities or towns

Read more >
Zalo
Phone
WhatsApp
Messenger
Messenger
WhatsApp
Phone
Zalo