Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Search
Close this search box.

USCIS Publishes New Guidance on Scope of Evidence in Cases of Extraordinary Ability

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) has updated its Policy Manual to provide guidance on the type of “published material” that persons applying for an Employment Based First Preference Immigrant Visa category (“EB-1”) can present as evidence when applying for the visa category.

Persons with “extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics” can self- petition for the “EB-1A” classification without a job offer or certification from the Department of Labor if they meet the requirements for that visa category.

A U.S. employer, including a university or institution of higher learning or private employer, may petition for an “outstanding professor or researcher” (“EB-1B”) who is internationally recognized as outstanding in a specific academic area to work in a tenured or tenure-track position or a comparable position to conduct research.

The USCIS has updated its guidance regarding the evidentiary criteria for persons of extraordinary ability and outstanding professors and researchers to more closely align with recently issued nonimmigrant guidance pertaining to O-1A nonimmigrants of extraordinary ability.

This guidance clarifies that for the extraordinary ability and outstanding professor or researcher classifications, “published material” about the person (or the person’s work in the case of an outstanding professor or researcher) in professional or major trade publications or other major media no longer must be a printed article; but rather, can be more varied forms of evidence including a transcript of audio or video coverage.

For an outstanding professor or researcher, a person may satisfy the “leading or critical role” criterion through a qualifying role for a distinguished department or division in addition to an entire organization or establishment.

It is always refreshing to see the USCIS issue guidance that helps both expand on qualifications and define more clearly criteria for any visa classification.  If you think you may qualify as a person with extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics or as an outstanding professor or researcher, and want to know more, contact us at info@enterpartners.com and speak with a U.S. immigration attorney in Ho Chi Minh City, Manila, and Taipei.

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office

Suite 601, 6th Floor, Saigon Tower
29 Le Duan Street
Ben Nghe Ward, District 1
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Tel: +84 933 301 488

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ

Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office

LKG Tower 37th Floor
6801 Ayala Avenue
Makati City, Philippines 1226

Tel: +632 5310 1491

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines

Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

Copyright 2022. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

Trump’s EO Ending Birthright Citizenship Dealt Another Setback by A Second Judge

President Donald Trump’s Executive Order (“EO”) ending birthright citizenship was dealt another setback after a second federal judge ordered an additional pause. Judge Deborah Boardman of the Federal District of Maryland issued a nationwide injunction against the EO commenting that no court in the country has endorsed the Trump administration’s interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Boardman’s ruling comes after Judge John Coughenour of Washington State ordered a temporary injunction after commenting that the EO “boggles the mind” and could not remember seeing a case that was more blatantly unconstitutional in more than 40 years on the bench as a federal judge. For more information on upcoming legal challenges surrounding Trump’s EO ending birthright citizenship, contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com. ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING    Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office    146C7 Nguyen Van Huong St, Thao Dien Ward,   District 2, Thu Duc City   Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam    Tel: +84 933 301 488   Email: info@enterlinepartners.com   Facebook: Enterline &

Read more >

USCIS Will No Longer Require Covid -19 Vaccinations For Adjustment Of Status Applicants

Effective January 22, 2025, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) will no longer require adjustment of status applicants to present proof of a COVID-19 vaccination as part of their Form I-693, Report of Immigration Medical Examination and Vaccination Record. The USCIS further commented that the agency will no longer issue Requests for Evidence or a Notice of Intent to Deny related to COVID-19 vaccinations. Applicants applying for immigrant visas at a U.S. Embassy or Consulate are still required to present COVID-19 vaccinations when undergoing a medical evaluation by a panel physician at a clinic licensed by the Centers of Disease Control. Immigrant visa applicants who are unable to present proof of a COVID-19 vaccination may be eligible for a waiver. For more information, contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com. ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING    Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office    146C7 Nguyen Van Huong St, Thao Dien Ward,   District 2, Thu Duc

Read more >

Federal Lawsuit Filed Immediately Following Trump’s Executive Order Ending Birthright Citizenship

Less than 2 hours after President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order (“EO”) attempting to end birthright citizenship, immigrant advocates started to file lawsuits in Federal Court attempting to block Trump’s Executive Order. The first lawsuit was filed in the U.S. Federal District Court of New Hampshire  on behalf of a group representing Indonesian migrants in the State. It was signed by a total of twenty-six (26) attorneys representing the American Civil Liberties Union, State Democracy Defends Fund, the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Endowment Fund, League of United Latin American Citizens and Make the Road New York as plaintiffs. Following New Hampshire, more than two dozen additional lawsuits were filed against the EO in Federal District Courts contending that the EO violates the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment, U.S. Supreme Court precedent since 1898 (United States v. Wong Kim Ark), as well as federal law which has been practiced

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon