Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Search
Close this search box.

What is Lawful Source of Funds and Path of Funds for an EB-5 Immigrant Investor?

The investment capital that an EB-5 Investor may use for his or her investment, called the “lawful source of funds” (“SOF”), can come from any source as long as the investor can prove that the capital or funds were obtained lawfully. Some common SOF are salary and bonus income, dividends from a company, stock options earned, or investment income. Easily the most common SOF, in about 80% of cases, is an investor using a property owned by him or her or a family member such as a home or an apartment.

In this instance, the investor liquidates the funds for the investment by selling the home or obtaining a mortgage loan against the property. There is still a need to source what we call the “seed money” which is to identify how the investor lawfully obtained the property, although the further back in time the acquisition occurred, the less documentation is usually required because it is understandable that records may not exist going back many years.

The funds must be personally invested into a qualifying business, called the New Commercial Enterprise (“NCE”) by the investor. For example, the funds cannot originate from an investor’s business which he or she would remit straight into the NCE. The investor must first own and control the funds at some point before investing. Thus, if an investor wants to use accumulated capital from an existing business, he or she must take a distribution, pay whatever tax liability might be applicable, and then personally invest the capital into the NCE under his or her name, although in some situations a transfer agent can act to remit the funds on behalf of the investor.

There are some ways that an investor might “borrow” capital from a company but these can be complex and generally we prefer to avoid them.

If an investor has earned salary and distributions over many years, we would need to show receipt of such funds and then a link to where the funds are before the transfer begins. Few investors leave sizable sums of salary or bonus income sitting in a savings account. Most investors will deploy funds it into various income earning products so it will be necessary to trace those funds which are being liquidated to be used for the investment.

The second critical factor is the path of funds. The investor must be able to trace the path of the funds from the source all the way to the remittance into the NCE account.

In transferring the funds to the NCE, accumulating the funds into the investor’s account and then remitting to the NCE account should be clearly documented. In countries with currency exchange and remittance restrictions, this can be a significant obstacle. Failure in the transfer of funds is one of the most common reasons for a denied I-526 petition.

 

Contact Enterline and Partners for more information on the EB-5 immigrant investor visa.

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office
Ad: 3F, IBC building, 1A Cong Truong Me Linh Str., District 1, HCMC, Vietnam
Tel: +84 933 301 488
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com
Facebook: Enterline and Partners-Đầu Tư Định Cư tại Mỹ
Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office
Ad: Unit 2507 Cityland 10 Tower 1, 156 H.V. Dela Costa Street, Makati City, Philippines 1209
Tel: +632 5310 1491
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com
Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines
Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

What is a Joint Sponsor for a Form I-864 Affidavit of Support?

A Joint Sponsor for Form I-864, Affidavit of Support, is an individual who agrees to share the financial responsibility for sponsoring an immigrant when the primary sponsor (the Petitioner) does not meet the minimum income requirements. The joint sponsor must meet certain eligibility criteria and file their own Form I-864 in addition to the primary sponsor’s form. What is the Eligibility Criteria for a Joint Sponsor? No Obligation to Be Related: Unlike the primary sponsor, the joint sponsor does not need to be related to the immigrant. What are the Responsibilities of a Joint Sponsor? When signing Form I-864, the joint sponsor agrees to: What Are the Filing Process for a Joint Sponsor? Multiple joint sponsors may be involved if needed. Each joint sponsor however must independently meet the income requirements for their own household size and file their own I-864. For more information on this ruling, please contact us

Read more >

President-Elect Trump’s Mass Deportation Begins to Take Hold

During the 2024 campaign,  former president and candidate Donald J. Trump promised mass deportation for millions on undocumented migrants in the United States. It appears that the campaign pledges are beginning to take hold. Last week, President-elect Trump named Thomas Homan as the “Border Tsar.” Homan, a former police officer and immigration official who previously served during the Obama administration and the first Trump administration as Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director has made it clear that mass deportation will be effectively carried out. “We have a mandate. I think the American people just gave President Trump a mandate. That’s why he’s elected – to secure the border, save lives, and deport people, especially national security threats and public safety threats,” said Homan. Homan commented that the immediate focus will be those in the country illegally with criminal convictions or charges. “It’s not going to be a massive sweep of neighborhoods.

Read more >

Federal Judge Strikes Down Parole-in-Place Program

A U.S. Federal Court Judge has struck down Parole-in-Place following an earlier decision granting the State of Texas and fifteen (15) other states an administrative stay two months ago. Judge J. Campbell Barker of the Eastern District of Texas ruled that the program, which would fast-track permanent residency to certain undocumented immigrants to obtain lawful permanent residents who are spouses and stepchildren of U.S. citizens, “exceeded its statutory authority and is not in accordance with the law.”  Judge Barker further added that the program “focuses on the wrong thing, in identifying ‘significant public benefits’- the benefits of aliens’ new legal status – rather than their presence in the country.”  At the time of publishing this article, it is unclear whether the Biden Administration will appeal Judge Barker’s ruling.  For more information on this ruling, please contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com. ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING    Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office    146C7

Read more >