Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

What is the Doctrine of Consular Nonreviewability?

The doctrine of consular nonreviewability refers to visa decisions decided by consular officers at U.S. Embassies and Consulates cannot be appealed to courts within the United States. The doctrine applies very broadly to decisions made by consular officers whether they apply to foreign nationals who have been refused an immigrant or nonimmigrant visa or by U.S. citizens or residents who receive a decision that adversely affects them. Consular nonreviewability however does not apply to decisions made by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services.

While consular nonreviewability provides consular officers with a certain amount of legal protection in adjudicating visa applications once a decision has been made, the doctrine does not prevent an individual (person or corporation) from suing an Embassy or Consulate for an unreasonable delay or failure to make a decision. In the event an Embassy or Consulate has failed to reach a decision or has unreasonably delayed reaching a decision, a mandamus action against the Embassy or Consulate may be filed in a U.S. Court.

A mandamus action asks a court to order a government entity to complete a specific task that it is obligated to do under the law. Within U.S. immigration law, there are many tasks that an Embassy or Consulate is required to perform. When those tasks are not completed or they take an unreasonably long time to complete, a mandamus action may be filed to command the Embassy or Consulate to finish its job.

Once the Embassy or Consulate has reached a decision and issues a refusal on a nonimmigrant or immigrant visa application, a mandamus action would no longer be an appropriate action as a result of consular nonreviewability. However, other options may be available such as a reapplication or in the event of an immigrant visa application refusal where the petition is sent back to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, an opportunity to respond.

For more information of the doctrine of consular nonreviewability, contact us today at info@enterlinepartners.com and speak with a U.S. immigration attorney in Ho Chi Minh City, Manila and Taipei.

 

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office

Suite 601, 6th Floor, Saigon Tower
29 Le Duan Street
Ben Nghe Ward, District 1
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Tel: +84 933 301 488

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ

Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office

LKG Tower 37th Floor
6801 Ayala Avenue
Makati City, Philippines 1226

Tel: +632 5310 1491

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines

Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

Copyright 2022. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

contact us today for more information

Latest News

DOS Releases Fact Sheet On Establishing Birth Tourism Prevention Task Force

The United States Department of State (“DOS”) has released a fact sheet on establishing a new Birth Tourism Prevention Task Force (“Task Force”) that reviews nonimmigrant visa holders activities specifically to identify those who have engaged in birth tourism and to revoke visas for those who engage or facilitate in the practice. The Task Force, which is being overseen by DOS Secretary Marco Rubio, will have a number of functions including the following: According to the Task Force, birth tourism has become a for-profit industry with facilitators marketing the practice as doulas, midwives, or wellness advocates while advertising “birth in the U.S.” services complete with visa coaching and medical arrangements. The Task Force further notes that some facilitators have gone as far as forging medical records, coaching clients to conceal their true travel purposes, and avoid paying hospital bills complete with online marketing promises of “automatic citizenship” for their child

Read more >

Regional Center Amendments and Record Keeping

Regional Centers participating in the EB-5 Immigrant Investor program are subject to ongoing compliance requirements designed to maintain transparency and accountability. These requirements include notifying the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) of significant organizational changes, maintaining records for a specified period, and cooperating with government audits. Understanding these obligations is important for Regional Centers as they continue to operate and support EB-5 investment projects. Notification Requirements for Significant Changes A Regional Center is required to notify the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) of significant proposed changes to its organizational structure, ownership, or administration. This includes the sale of the Regional Center, as well as other arrangements that would result in individuals who were not previously subject to the requirements under subparagraph (H) (INA§203(b)(5)(H)) becoming involved with the Regional Center. In such cases, the Regional Center must provide notice to the DHS no later than 120 days before the significant

Read more >

New USCIS Policy Aims to Reduce Frivolous and Incomplete Filings

The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) has amended a previous policy during the Biden Administration which encouraged adjudicating officers to issue a Request for Evidence (“RFE”) before denying an immigration benefit even if the benefit being sought was filed incomplete, the requestor failed to demonstrate eligibility for the benefit being sought, or did not provide initial evidence clearly required at the time of submission. According to USCIS, the previous policy allowed for frivolous or substantially incomplete filings which slowed processing times and led to increased operational costs. The new policy, which was announced on August 5, 2026, restores an adjudicating officer’s full discretion in denying an immigration benefit without first issuing an RFE or a Notice of Intent to Deny (“NOID”). Updated policy highlights include the following:  The revised policy is effective immediately and applies to immigration benefits that remain pending with USCIS or filed on or after

Read more >
Zalo
Phone
WhatsApp
Messenger
Messenger
WhatsApp
Phone
Zalo