Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

U.S. Border Control Agents Refusing Entry to Travelers Over Other People’s Social Media Postings

While non-immigrant visa applicants have been required to disclose social media handles on their DS-160 Online Application since June 2019, certain visa holders such as those entering the United States on B-1/ B-2 visitor visas and F-1 student visas have reported an increased number of entry refusals because of other people’s social media accounts.

The latest case saw a Palestinian national living in Lebanon who was traveling to the United States on an F-1 student visa where he was scheduled to begin his freshman year at Harvard University. Upon arriving at Boston Logan International Airport, 17-year old Isamil Ajjawi was allegedly questioned by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for his religious beliefs. According to Ajjawi, CBP officers searched his electronic devices and took issue with his friends social media activity. Ajjawi’s F-1 student visa was cancelled and he was immediately sent back to Lebanon. 

On an average day, roughly 1.13 million passengers are processed entry by CBP and airports, seaports, and land crossings while roughly 800 passengers are refused admission at the Port of Entry. Sometimes, refusing to admit a passenger is clear such as material misrepresentation when applying for a non-immigrant visa or previous violations while inside the United States such as unauthorized work. Other times however, CBP offers no specific reasons and the decision to refuse a non-immigrant visa holder from entering the United States is non-appealable. 

If you are from Vietnam, the Philippines or Taiwan and have been refused entry to the United States, contact our U.S. immigration lawyers in Ho Chi Minh City, Manila and Taipei for expert advice.

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING
Ad: 3F, IBC building, 1A Cong Truong Me Linh Str, District 1, HCMC.
Tel: 0933 301 488
CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

successful i-130 dcf approval hcmc

Enterline and Partners Succesfully Expedites I-130 Petition with Direct Consular Filing at the U.S. Consulate in Ho Chi Minh City

Enterline and Partners is pleased to announce that our attorneys have successfully represented another client with Direct Consular Filing (“DCF”) of  an I-130 Petition for Alien Relative (“I-130 Petition”) at the U.S. Consulate in Ho Chi Minh City (“Consulate.”) Our clients, a U.S. citizen and Vietnamese citizen, approached us after the U.S. citizen received a job offer which required his immediate relocation back to the United States. Following our consultation session in which we thoroughly discussed how DCF is adjudicated as well as advising that it remains discretionary, the couple decided to proceed and engaged our office to file the initial DCF request. Our team worked diligently in gathering all of the required and supplemental documentation needed before the DCF request could be filed. Once everything was finalized, we submitted the request. Less than a week later, the Consulate approved our DCF request and scheduled the client to file the

Read more >
supreme court

Supreme Court Hands the Trump Administration a Partial Victory in Ongoing Birthright Citizenship Litigation

The United States Supreme Court has given President Donald Trump’s Executive Order (“EO”) curbing birthright citizenship a partial victory. The ruling does not impact “Birthright Citizenship” but rather restricts district court judges from issuing nation-wide (or “universal”) injunctions against Executive Orders.  In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that lower federal court judges who issued nationwide injunctions against the EO went too far and granted the Trump Administration’s request to narrow the injunctions issued in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts. While the Supreme Court’s ruling was a dramatic shift in how lower federal court judges have operated for years, the decision left enough room for challengers to the EO to prevent it from taking effect while litigation works its way through the federal court system. Specifically, the EO, which also suffered a setback by the Federal Court of Appeals will remain blocked for an additional thirty (30) days) allowing the

Read more >
form i0854

When Do Sponsor Obligations End Under Form I-864?

For immigrants to the United States, the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support (“Form I-864”), is a critical part of the family-based immigration process. It is a legally enforceable contract in which a sponsor agrees to financially support the intended immigrant, helping ensure that the immigrant does not rely on certain U.S. government benefits after becoming a permanent resident. By signing Form I-864, the sponsor takes on long-term financial responsibility, but this obligation is not indefinite. The U.S. government outlines specific situations under which the sponsor’s duties come to an end. When Will These Obligations End?  A sponsors obligations under a Form I-864 end when the sponsored immigrant: A sponsor’s obligations under a Form I-864 also end if the sponsor dies. As such, the sponsor’s estate is not required to take responsibility for the sponsored immigrant following the sponsor’s death. Divorce does not terminate the responsibility, and if the sponsor dies,

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon