Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Final Guidelines on Unlawful Presence for Students and Exchange Visitors

United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) August 9, 2018 policy memorandum revises the calculation of unlawful presence of those under F, J, or M nonimmigrant visa status and their dependents during their stay in the United States.

Under the new memorandum, those holding F, J, or M visas who have failed to maintain their 2018 will have started to accrue unlawful presence on that day or on the earliest of the following:
nonimmigrant status before August 9,

  • If the DHS made a formal finding that the F, J, or M visa holder violated his or her nonimmigrant status: the day after the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) denied the request for an immigration benefit;
  • If the F, J, or M visa holder was admitted for a certain date: the day after the authorized period expired;

If an immigration judge ordered the F, J, or M visa holder excluded, deported, or removed: the day after the removal order is issued, regardless of whether or not the decision is appealed.

For those who failed to maintain their nonimmigrant status on or after August 9, 2018, unlawful presence begins on the earliest of the following:

  • The day after the F, J, or M visa holder no longer pursues the course of study or the authorized activity;
  • The day after the F, J, or M visa holder engages in an unauthorized activity;
  • The day after completing the course of study program, including any authorized practical training and any authorized grace period;
  • The day after the authorized period expired if the F, J, or M visa holder was admitted for a certain date;

The day after an immigration judge ordered the F, J, or M visa holder excluded, deported or removed, regardless of whether or not the decision is appealed.

To maintain nonimmigrant status, F, J, or M visa holders must be enrolled in a full-time course study or remain in the exchange program, not engage in unauthorized employment or other unauthorized activities, and complete the academic or exchange program in a timely manner or obtain an extension from the school or exchange program.

F, J, or M visa holders can accidentally or unknowingly violate their status through seemingly innocent activities. These activities include, but are not limited to dropping below a full course or working an hour over the allowed number of working hours. Those actions may then lead to a 3-year or 10-year ban since persons who accrues more than 180 days of unlawful presence in the U.S. is generally barred from returning to the U.S. for 3 years while a person who departs after accruing one year or more of unlawful presence is barred from returning for 10 years.

An application for reinstatement filed by an F and M visa holder not more than five months after they have been out of status may have their accrual of unlawful presence tolled while the application for reinstatement is pending with the USCIS. If the application is denied, the accrual of unlawful presence resumes on the day after the denial. If an F, J, or M visa holder’s application for reinstatement is ultimately approved, they will generally not accrue unlawful presence for the time that they were out of status.

This policy also affects the dependents of those who are studying or will study in the U.S. since the dependent’s authorized period of stay is contingent on the F, J, or M visa holder remaining in a period of authorized stay and ends when the F, J, or M visa authorized period of stay ends, or upon the dependent’s own conduct.

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING
Ad: 3F, IBC building, 1A Cong Truong Me Linh Str, District 1, HCMC.
Tel: 0933 301 488
CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

Congratulations to David Enterline – 30 years since becoming an American Immigration Lawyers Association (“AILA”) member

Congratulations to Enterline and Partners’ David Enterline who has reached a 30 year anniversary of first becoming an American Immigration Lawyers Association (“AILA”) member.  AILA is the 16,000+ association of U.S. and international lawyers who practice U.S. immigration law. During his membership, David has been active as a member in the Asia-Pacific Chapter serving in various roles of leadership in the Chapter.  Both David and partner Ryan Barshop are active members and often speak at regional and national AILA events on various immigration topics. If you have question about U.S. visas and immigration, please contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com. ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office 146C7 Nguyen Van Huong St, Thao Dien Ward,District 2, Thu Duc CityHo Chi Minh City, Vietnam Tel: +84 933 301 488Email: info@enterlinepartners.comFacebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa KỳYouTube: @EnterlineAndPartnersConsultingWebsite: http://enterlinepartners.com Manila, Philippines Office LKG Tower 37th Floor 6801 Ayala

Read more >
successful i-130 dcf approval hcmc

Enterline and Partners Successfully Expedites I-130 Petition with Direct Consular Filing at the U.S. Consulate in Ho Chi Minh City

Enterline and Partners is pleased to announce that our attorneys have successfully represented another client with Direct Consular Filing (“DCF”) of  an I-130 Petition for Alien Relative (“I-130 Petition”) at the U.S. Consulate in Ho Chi Minh City (“Consulate.”) Our clients, a U.S. citizen and Vietnamese citizen, approached us after the U.S. citizen received a job offer which required his immediate relocation back to the United States. Following our consultation session in which we thoroughly discussed how DCF is adjudicated as well as advising that it remains discretionary, the couple decided to proceed and engaged our office to file the initial DCF request. Our team worked diligently in gathering all of the required and supplemental documentation needed before the DCF request could be filed. Once everything was finalized, we submitted the request. Less than a week later, the Consulate approved our DCF request and scheduled the client to file the

Read more >
supreme court

Supreme Court Hands the Trump Administration a Partial Victory in Ongoing Birthright Citizenship Litigation

The United States Supreme Court has given President Donald Trump’s Executive Order (“EO”) curbing birthright citizenship a partial victory. The ruling does not impact “Birthright Citizenship” but rather restricts district court judges from issuing nation-wide (or “universal”) injunctions against Executive Orders.  In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that lower federal court judges who issued nationwide injunctions against the EO went too far and granted the Trump Administration’s request to narrow the injunctions issued in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts. While the Supreme Court’s ruling was a dramatic shift in how lower federal court judges have operated for years, the decision left enough room for challengers to the EO to prevent it from taking effect while litigation works its way through the federal court system. Specifically, the EO, which also suffered a setback by the Federal Court of Appeals will remain blocked for an additional thirty (30) days) allowing the

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon