Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Search
Close this search box.

The EB-5 Regional Center Program Will Lapse on June 30, 2021

The EB-5 Immigrant Investor “Regional Center” Program (“Program”) will lapse on June 30, 2021 due to the failure of the U.S. Congress to reauthorize or extend it before the expiration date.  Because the Senate has adjourned for recess until July 12, 2021, the Program will remain unavailable as no legislation to reauthorize the Program will be passed before that time.

As a result, any investor and family members who do not already have immigrant visas issued by a U.S. Consulate will not be issued immigrant visas to enter the U.S., and any investor and family members whose adjustment of status application has not yet been approved by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) will not be eligible to adjust their status to permanent residency.

The USCIS has not issued recent guidance on what it will do with EB-5 investor’s Form I-526 Petitions or Form I-485 Adjustment of Status Applications that have not been adjudicated.    Based on previous sunsets of the Program, the USCIS is likely to hold I-526 Petitions and I-485 Applications in abeyance for some time to wait and see if Congress will reauthorize the program.  The U.S. Department of State will no longer be able to issue immigrant visas during this sunset period.

EB-5 investors who have petitioned or applied for immigrant visas based on “Direct” investments – investments into businesses that are not associated with a regional center and rely on direct jobs – remain unaffected by the sunset of the Program.

EB-5 investors who already have valid immigrant visas should still be eligible to enter the U.S. and obtain conditional permanent residence; however, this conclusion is based on USCIS guidance from 2009.   It is also expected that USCIS will continue to review and approve Form I-829 Petitions to remove the condition from conditional permanent residents as it has done so in the past.

It is critical to continue to extend, or hopefully make permanent, the Program to protect the eligibility of tens of thousands of investors and family members who have made substantial investments into the U.S., filed I-526 Petitions and are waiting in line for EB-5 visas to become available.

View Original Article: U.S. District Court Rules to Overturn EB-5 Regulations; Investment Amount Reduced to $500,000 – for Now.

If you have questions about the sunset of the EB-5 Program, contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com and speak with a U.S. immigration attorney in Ho Chi Minh City, Manila and Taipei.

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office

Suite 601, 6th Floor, Saigon Tower
29 Le Duan Street
Ben Nghe Ward, District 1
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Tel: +84 933 301 488

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ

Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office

LKG Tower 37th Floor
6801 Ayala Avenue
Makati City, Philippines 1226

Tel: +632 5310 1491

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines

Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

Copyright 2021. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

What Is Adjustment Of Status For U.S. Immigration Purposes?

Under U.S. immigration law, Adjustment of Status (“AOS”) refers to the process through which an individual who is already in the United States applies to change their immigration status from that of a nonimmigrant visa status to that of an immigrant visa status, or “Lawful Permanent Residence”. This process is typically pursued by individuals who entered the U.S. legally on a temporary basis as a nonimmigrant and later decide to stay permanently.  One of the best examples is when a student on F-1 status to attend a four year bachelor degree program is offered a job and qualifies at the end of their studies. They may then be eligible for Adjustment of Status. All AOS Applicants must fulfill certain qualifying requirements in order to apply for Adjustment of Status. They must have entered the U.S. lawfully, such as with a valid nonimmigrant visa and be physically present in the United

Read more >

Delinquent U.S. Taxpayers in Southeast Asia

While living in the Southeast Asian region, it’s easy to forget about U.S. tax obligations, especially if the taxpayer’s income is deemed “minimal.”  Let’s first re-visit our tax filing requirements, where an excerpt is noted right on the last page of one’s U.S. Passport, “All U.S. Citizens working and residing abroad are required to file and report on their worldwide income. Consult IRS Publication 54 …” Tax practitioners may use the standard deduction as the filing threshold. For tax year 2024, single status filers can claim up to $14,600 as a standard deduction. Therefore, if one can maintain and produce supporting documentation that the tax year’s income is below the standard deduction threshold, the taxpayer may opt to not file a U.S. Income Tax Return. However, it’s good practice to still file a tax return  to show the U.S. Internal Revenue Service that your income is below the standard deduction

Read more >

Federal Court of Appeals Rules Against Trump’s EO Ending Birthright Citizenship

A Federal Court of Appeals handed the Trump Administration another blow in its fight to redefine the 14th Amendment ending birthright citizenship through Executive Order (“EO”). The San Francisco-based Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the Administration’s request for an emergency order putting on hold a nationwide ban issued by Seattle-based Judge John Coughenour last month who found the EO blatantly unconstitutional. Judge Coughenour decision was swiftly followed by Judge Deborah Boardman’s decision in Maryland who also ruled that the EO needed to be stopped. While the Trump Administration argued that Judge Coughenour’s ruling went too far, a three-judge panel disagreed and scheduled the case for arguments in June. U.S. Circuit Judge Danielle Forrest, whom Trump appointed during his first term, said that a rapid decision would risk eroding public confidence in judges who must “reach their decisions apart from ideology or political preference.” The other judges on the panel,

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon