Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Search
Close this search box.

A DS-261 Online Choice of Agent Form Cannot Be Used as a Substitute to Replace a U.S. Attorney’s G-28 in Immigration Matters

United States licensed attorneys representing clients before the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) or the Department of State (“DOS”) submit a Form G-28 Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Accredited Representative (“Form G-28”). Submitting a Form G-28 notifies DHS and DOS that this person is being represented by an attorney.  This is particularly helpful if during the process, problems occur which could result in an adverse decision for the client such as rejection or refusal of the immigration benefit being sought.

The Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”), which is the law for U.S. federal agencies like DHS or DOS, is very specific on the definition of an “attorney.” Specifically, 8 CFR 1.2 states that an attorney is “any person who is eligible to practice law, and is a member in good standing, not currently being subjected to discipline of the state bar in any state.” Because the definition is expressly clear, it precludes any other person, such as a visa agent or foreign licensed attorney, from meeting that requirement. As such, only representatives (attorneys) who meet the definition may file a Form G-28.

Visa agents and non-U.S. licensed attorneys are precluded from submitting a Form G-28. Instead, many visa agents or foreign attorneys who offer U.S. immigration services often inform their clients that a DS-261, Online Choice of Address and Agent (“DS-216”) filed with DOS is an acceptable substitute for a Form G-28 which allows them to interact with DHS or DOS on the client’s behalf. This unfortunately is misrepresentation even if the visa agent or foreign attorney has been engaging in such practice for years and has never had any problems with either DHS or DOS. In fact, the rules are quite strict and are designed to protect individual petitioners and beneficiaries from unauthorized or fraudulent practitioners while using the generic term “agent” to mislead clients into believing that a DS-261 will allow them to act as an authorized representative.

Within the context of a DS-261, the Foreign Affairs Manual (“FAM”), which is the “operating manual” for DOS, a DS-261 allows the principal applicant to designate an agent for his or her case. The term agent under the FAM means a person who will receive mail from DOS and the agent may be the petitioner, an attorney, friend, or nongovernmental or community-based organization such as one that assists refugees. The agent however cannot complete and sign documents on behalf of the applicant nor assist with fee payments, collect professional fees for such services, nor assist with documentation collection. The applicant may choose to designate him or herself as the agent.

Regretfully, visa agents or foreign attorneys who offer U.S. immigration services often try to circumvent the meaning of “agent” as defined by the FAM by informing their clients that if asked, the visa agent or the foreign licensed attorney is the applicant’s “friend” hiding this repetitive violation and fundamental dishonesty.  Most importantly, such agents are not trained to identify potential problems with an applicant’s case and may not be able to help to solve the problem if it occurs.

For more information on how a U.S. immigration attorney in Asia can help you with your immigrant requirements, contact us today at info@enterlinepartners.com and speak with one of our attorneys in Ho Chi Minh City, Manila and Taipei.

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office

Suite 601, 6th Floor, Saigon Tower
29 Le Duan Street
Ben Nghe Ward, District 1
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Tel: +84 933 301 488

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ

Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office

LKG Tower 37th Floor
6801 Ayala Avenue
Makati City, Philippines 1226

Tel: +632 5310 1491

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines

Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

Copyright 2021. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

National Visa Center/American Institute In Taiwan No Longer Accepting Taiwan Birth Certificates

Sometime in 2024, the United States Department of State (“DOS”) quietly updated its requirements for birth certificates in the DOS Reciprocity Schedule for Taiwan.  Birth Certificates seem no longer required or accepted for Taiwan nationals. The only acceptable document for proof of birth is now an Individual Household Registration Transcript. The Individual Household Registration Transcript is part of Taiwan’s greater Household Registration System to which all Taiwan nationals must have registered with the Taiwan government.  The Transcript provides a record of a household’s members and their relationship to each other, including details like birth, marriage, and death. Moreover, DOS National Visa Center is not accepting bilingual Chinese and English versions which are now widely available. The National Visa Center is requiring an original Chinese version and an original English version issued by the Household Registration Office, although we have been successful submitting a translation of the original Chinese version.  

Read more >

David Enterline And Ryan Barshop Speak At AILA APAC Seoul Conference

Enterline and Partners attorneys David Enterline and Ryan Barshop recently spoke at the 2025 American Immigration Lawyers Association (“AILA”), Asia Pacific Chapter (“APAC”) Annual Conference in Seoul, South Korea. David Enterline was the discussion leader of the EB-5 Panel titled “EB-5 State of Play Under the New Administration”.  Along with important challenges like I-485 processing delays, USCIS receipt number issues, visa rollover concerns, and ongoing litigation—including IIUSA’s challenge to USCIS’s sustainment policy and the Battineni v. Mayorkas ruling regarding EB-5 fund sourcing requirements—the topics covered included the encouraging rise in I-526/I-526E and I-829 petition approvals. Updates on tax planning, concurrent filing tactics and other topics were also discussed. On the panel “Live from the Trenches with Consular Post Experts in our APAC Region”, Ryan Barshop was one of the featured speakers. The event’s topics included advice on how to handle visa procedures at U.S. Embassies and Consulates throughout Asia. During

Read more >

DHS to Begin Screening Foreign Nationals Social Media Activity for Antisemetism

Effective immediately, the United States Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) will begin considering a foreign national’s antisemetic activity on social media and the physical harassment of Jewish individuals as grounds for denying immigration benefits. The new policy, which is consistent with President Donald Trump’s Executive Orders on Combatting Antisemetism, Additional Measures to Combat Antisemitism and Protecting the United States from Foreign Terrorists and Other National Security and Public Safety Threats; will apply to foreign nationals applying for an adjustment of status, foreign students on F-1 and M-1 student visas and those affiliated with educational institutions linked to antisemetic activity. The United States Department of State provides a working definition of antisemitism as “certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred towards Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestation of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions or religious facilities.” Under the new

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon