Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Search
Close this search box.

What is the Adam Walsh Act Child Protection and Safety Act?

The Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (“AWA”) is a U.S. federal statute that aims to protect children from sexual exploitation and violent crimes.  The AWA was named after Adam Walsh, a child who was abducted and murdered in the State of Florida in 1981. Following young Adam’s death, the child’s father, John Walsh rose to become a leading television presenter, criminologist and victims’ rights activist.

The AWA contains several provisions, including:

  1. Sex Offender Registration and Notification: The act establishes a national sex offender registry and requires sex offenders to register with the local police and keep their information current. It also requires states to adopt and implement registration and notification programs for covered sex offenders.
  2. Tiered Registration System: The act introduces a three-tiered system for classifying sex offenders based on the severity of their crimes. Offenders classified under Tier 3 are considered the most dangerous and subjected to the strictest possible registration requirements.
  3. Mandatory Minimum Standards for Registration: The act establishes minimum standards that states must meet regarding registration and notification of covered sex offenders.
  4. Child Pornography Offenses: The act establishes penalties for child pornography offenses and includes provisions to address online dissemination.
  5. Sexual Predator Tracking Apprehension: The act allocates federal resources for the tracking and apprehension of sex offenders with a particular focus on those who fail to register or comply with registration requirements.
  6. International Megan’s Law: Amended in 2016, this added provision requires the advanced notification of destination countries where a convicted sex offender intends to travel abroad.

The AWA imposes serious restrictions on the ability of U.S. Citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents who have been convicted of certain offenses against minors from being able to petition family members for immigrant visas with the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) unless the Secretary of Homeland Security determines in his or her sole and unreviewable discretion that petitioner poses no risk to the beneficiary of the visa petition.

Those fall under the AWA and wish to petition family members are strongly encouraged to consult with an immigration attorney.

For more information, contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com and speak with a U.S. immigration attorney in Ho Chi Minh City, Manila and Taipei.

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office

146C7 Nguyen Van Huong St, Thao Dien Ward,
District 2, Thu Duc City
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Tel: +84 933 301 488
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com
Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ
YouTube: @EnterlineAndPartnersConsulting
Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office

LKG Tower 37th Floor
6801 Ayala Avenue
Makati City, Philippines 1226

Tel: +63 917 543 7926
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com
Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines
Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

Copyright 2023. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

What is a Joint Sponsor for a Form I-864 Affidavit of Support?

A Joint Sponsor for Form I-864, Affidavit of Support, is an individual who agrees to share the financial responsibility for sponsoring an immigrant when the primary sponsor (the Petitioner) does not meet the minimum income requirements. The joint sponsor must meet certain eligibility criteria and file their own Form I-864 in addition to the primary sponsor’s form. What is the Eligibility Criteria for a Joint Sponsor? No Obligation to Be Related: Unlike the primary sponsor, the joint sponsor does not need to be related to the immigrant. What are the Responsibilities of a Joint Sponsor? When signing Form I-864, the joint sponsor agrees to: What Are the Filing Process for a Joint Sponsor? Multiple joint sponsors may be involved if needed. Each joint sponsor however must independently meet the income requirements for their own household size and file their own I-864. For more information, please contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com. ENTERLINE

Read more >

President-Elect Trump’s Mass Deportation Begins to Take Hold

During the 2024 campaign,  former president and candidate Donald J. Trump promised mass deportation for millions on undocumented migrants in the United States. It appears that the campaign pledges are beginning to take hold. Last week, President-elect Trump named Thomas Homan as the “Border Tsar.” Homan, a former police officer and immigration official who previously served during the Obama administration and the first Trump administration as Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director has made it clear that mass deportation will be effectively carried out. “We have a mandate. I think the American people just gave President Trump a mandate. That’s why he’s elected – to secure the border, save lives, and deport people, especially national security threats and public safety threats,” said Homan. Homan commented that the immediate focus will be those in the country illegally with criminal convictions or charges. “It’s not going to be a massive sweep of neighborhoods.

Read more >

Federal Judge Strikes Down Parole-in-Place Program

A U.S. Federal Court Judge has struck down Parole-in-Place following an earlier decision granting the State of Texas and fifteen (15) other states an administrative stay two months ago. Judge J. Campbell Barker of the Eastern District of Texas ruled that the program, which would fast-track permanent residency to certain undocumented immigrants to obtain lawful permanent residents who are spouses and stepchildren of U.S. citizens, “exceeded its statutory authority and is not in accordance with the law.”  Judge Barker further added that the program “focuses on the wrong thing, in identifying ‘significant public benefits’- the benefits of aliens’ new legal status – rather than their presence in the country.”  At the time of publishing this article, it is unclear whether the Biden Administration will appeal Judge Barker’s ruling.  For more information on this ruling, please contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com. ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING    Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office    146C7

Read more >