Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

logo
Search
Close this search box.
Enterlineparterns_logo

What is the Adam Walsh Act Child Protection and Safety Act?

The Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (“AWA”) is a U.S. federal statute that aims to protect children from sexual exploitation and violent crimes.  The AWA was named after Adam Walsh, a child who was abducted and murdered in the State of Florida in 1981. Following young Adam’s death, the child’s father, John Walsh rose to become a leading television presenter, criminologist and victims’ rights activist.

The AWA contains several provisions, including:

  1. Sex Offender Registration and Notification: The act establishes a national sex offender registry and requires sex offenders to register with the local police and keep their information current. It also requires states to adopt and implement registration and notification programs for covered sex offenders.
  2. Tiered Registration System: The act introduces a three-tiered system for classifying sex offenders based on the severity of their crimes. Offenders classified under Tier 3 are considered the most dangerous and subjected to the strictest possible registration requirements.
  3. Mandatory Minimum Standards for Registration: The act establishes minimum standards that states must meet regarding registration and notification of covered sex offenders.
  4. Child Pornography Offenses: The act establishes penalties for child pornography offenses and includes provisions to address online dissemination.
  5. Sexual Predator Tracking Apprehension: The act allocates federal resources for the tracking and apprehension of sex offenders with a particular focus on those who fail to register or comply with registration requirements.
  6. International Megan’s Law: Amended in 2016, this added provision requires the advanced notification of destination countries where a convicted sex offender intends to travel abroad.

The AWA imposes serious restrictions on the ability of U.S. Citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents who have been convicted of certain offenses against minors from being able to petition family members for immigrant visas with the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) unless the Secretary of Homeland Security determines in his or her sole and unreviewable discretion that petitioner poses no risk to the beneficiary of the visa petition.

Those fall under the AWA and wish to petition family members are strongly encouraged to consult with an immigration attorney.

For more information, contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com and speak with a U.S. immigration attorney in Ho Chi Minh City, Manila and Taipei.

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office

146C7 Nguyen Van Huong St, Thao Dien Ward,
District 2, Thu Duc City
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Tel: +84 933 301 488
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com
Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ
YouTube: @EnterlineAndPartnersConsulting
Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office

LKG Tower 37th Floor
6801 Ayala Avenue
Makati City, Philippines 1226

Tel: +63 917 543 7926
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com
Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines
Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

Copyright 2023. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.

CATEGORY
find
time
recent posts
view more
our services
view all services
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

Supreme Court Hands the Trump Administration a Partial Victory in Ongoing Birthright Citizenship Litigation

The United States Supreme Court has given President Donald Trump’s Executive Order (“EO”) curbing birthright citizenship a partial victory. The ruling does not impact “Birthright Citizenship” but rather restricts district court judges from issuing nation-wide (or “universal”) injunctions against Executive Orders.  In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that lower federal court judges who issued nationwide injunctions against the EO went too far and granted the Trump Administration’s request to narrow the injunctions issued in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts. While the Supreme Court’s ruling was a dramatic shift in how lower federal court judges have operated for years, the decision left enough room for challengers to the EO to prevent it from taking effect while litigation works its way through the federal court system. Specifically, the EO, which also suffered a setback by the Federal Court of Appeals will remain blocked for an additional thirty (30) days) allowing the

Read more >
July 4, 2025

When Do Sponsor Obligations End Under Form I-864?

For immigrants to the United States, the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support (“Form I-864”), is a critical part of the family-based immigration process. It is a legally enforceable contract in which a sponsor agrees to financially support the intended immigrant, helping ensure that the immigrant does not rely on certain U.S. government benefits after becoming a permanent resident. By signing Form I-864, the sponsor takes on long-term financial responsibility, but this obligation is not indefinite. The U.S. government outlines specific situations under which the sponsor’s duties come to an end. When Will These Obligations End?  A sponsors obligations under a Form I-864 end when the sponsored immigrant: A sponsor’s obligations under a Form I-864 also end if the sponsor dies. As such, the sponsor’s estate is not required to take responsibility for the sponsored immigrant following the sponsor’s death. Divorce does not terminate the responsibility, and if the sponsor dies,

Read more >
July 2, 2025

F, M and J Student Visa Interviews to Resume with Enhanced Social Media Vetting

The United States Department of State (“DOS”) has instructed Embassies and Consulates to begin accepting new F, M, and J student visa application appointments following a temporary suspension. The pause was initiated to allow DOS to implement policy changes regarding social media vetting. After the suspension, e F, M, and J student visa applicants are required to make their social media accounts public for vetting purposes. In a DOS announcement, DOS will use all information available for “visa screening and vetting to identify visa applicants who are inadmissible to the United States, including those who pose a threat to U.S. national security. Under this new guidance, we will conduct a comprehensive and thorough vetting, including online presence, of all student and exchange visitor applicants in the F, M, and J nonimmigrant classifications.” The new policy, following the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to begin screening anti-Semitic online activity posted by

Read more >
June 25, 2025
SERVICES
VIETNAM OFFICE
  • 146C7 Nguyen Van Huong St, Thao Dien Ward, Thu Duc City,
    Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
CONTACT
PHILIPPINES OFFICE
  • LKG Tower, 37th Floor
    6801 Ayala Avenue
    Makati City, Philippines 1226
CONTACT FORM
SERVICES
CONTACT
VIET NAM OFFICE
  • Suite 601, 6th Floor Saigon Tower
    29 Le Duan Street
    Ben Nghe Ward
    Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
PHILIPPINES OFFICE
  • LKG Tower, 37th Floor
    6801 Ayala Avenue
    Makati City, Philippines 1226
CONTACT FORM

Copyright 2012 – 2024 Enterline and Partners Consulting | All Rights Reserved

Gọi điện thoại
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon