Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Search
Close this search box.

What is the Adam Walsh Act Child Protection and Safety Act?

The Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (“AWA”) is a U.S. federal statute that aims to protect children from sexual exploitation and violent crimes.  The AWA was named after Adam Walsh, a child who was abducted and murdered in the State of Florida in 1981. Following young Adam’s death, the child’s father, John Walsh rose to become a leading television presenter, criminologist and victims’ rights activist.

The AWA contains several provisions, including:

  1. Sex Offender Registration and Notification: The act establishes a national sex offender registry and requires sex offenders to register with the local police and keep their information current. It also requires states to adopt and implement registration and notification programs for covered sex offenders.
  2. Tiered Registration System: The act introduces a three-tiered system for classifying sex offenders based on the severity of their crimes. Offenders classified under Tier 3 are considered the most dangerous and subjected to the strictest possible registration requirements.
  3. Mandatory Minimum Standards for Registration: The act establishes minimum standards that states must meet regarding registration and notification of covered sex offenders.
  4. Child Pornography Offenses: The act establishes penalties for child pornography offenses and includes provisions to address online dissemination.
  5. Sexual Predator Tracking Apprehension: The act allocates federal resources for the tracking and apprehension of sex offenders with a particular focus on those who fail to register or comply with registration requirements.
  6. International Megan’s Law: Amended in 2016, this added provision requires the advanced notification of destination countries where a convicted sex offender intends to travel abroad.

The AWA imposes serious restrictions on the ability of U.S. Citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents who have been convicted of certain offenses against minors from being able to petition family members for immigrant visas with the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) unless the Secretary of Homeland Security determines in his or her sole and unreviewable discretion that petitioner poses no risk to the beneficiary of the visa petition.

Those fall under the AWA and wish to petition family members are strongly encouraged to consult with an immigration attorney.

For more information, contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com and speak with a U.S. immigration attorney in Ho Chi Minh City, Manila and Taipei.

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office

146C7 Nguyen Van Huong St, Thao Dien Ward,
District 2, Thu Duc City
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Tel: +84 933 301 488
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com
Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ
YouTube: @EnterlineAndPartnersConsulting
Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office

LKG Tower 37th Floor
6801 Ayala Avenue
Makati City, Philippines 1226

Tel: +63 917 543 7926
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com
Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines
Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

Copyright 2023. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

Trump’s EO Ending Birthright Citizenship Dealt Another Setback by A Second Judge

President Donald Trump’s Executive Order (“EO”) ending birthright citizenship was dealt another setback after a second federal judge ordered an additional pause. Judge Deborah Boardman of the Federal District of Maryland issued a nationwide injunction against the EO commenting that no court in the country has endorsed the Trump administration’s interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Boardman’s ruling comes after Judge John Coughenour of Washington State ordered a temporary injunction after commenting that the EO “boggles the mind” and could not remember seeing a case that was more blatantly unconstitutional in more than 40 years on the bench as a federal judge. For more information on upcoming legal challenges surrounding Trump’s EO ending birthright citizenship, contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com. ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING    Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office    146C7 Nguyen Van Huong St, Thao Dien Ward,   District 2, Thu Duc City   Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam    Tel: +84 933 301 488   Email: info@enterlinepartners.com   Facebook: Enterline &

Read more >

USCIS Will No Longer Require Covid -19 Vaccinations For Adjustment Of Status Applicants

Effective January 22, 2025, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) will no longer require adjustment of status applicants to present proof of a COVID-19 vaccination as part of their Form I-693, Report of Immigration Medical Examination and Vaccination Record. The USCIS further commented that the agency will no longer issue Requests for Evidence or a Notice of Intent to Deny related to COVID-19 vaccinations. Applicants applying for immigrant visas at a U.S. Embassy or Consulate are still required to present COVID-19 vaccinations when undergoing a medical evaluation by a panel physician at a clinic licensed by the Centers of Disease Control. Immigrant visa applicants who are unable to present proof of a COVID-19 vaccination may be eligible for a waiver. For more information, contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com. ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING    Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office    146C7 Nguyen Van Huong St, Thao Dien Ward,   District 2, Thu Duc

Read more >

Federal Lawsuit Filed Immediately Following Trump’s Executive Order Ending Birthright Citizenship

Less than 2 hours after President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order (“EO”) attempting to end birthright citizenship, immigrant advocates started to file lawsuits in Federal Court attempting to block Trump’s Executive Order. The first lawsuit was filed in the U.S. Federal District Court of New Hampshire  on behalf of a group representing Indonesian migrants in the State. It was signed by a total of twenty-six (26) attorneys representing the American Civil Liberties Union, State Democracy Defends Fund, the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Endowment Fund, League of United Latin American Citizens and Make the Road New York as plaintiffs. Following New Hampshire, more than two dozen additional lawsuits were filed against the EO in Federal District Courts contending that the EO violates the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment, U.S. Supreme Court precedent since 1898 (United States v. Wong Kim Ark), as well as federal law which has been practiced

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon