Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Search
Close this search box.

USCIS Clarifies Sustainment Period Policy from the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022

On October 12, 2023, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) posted Questions and Answers to announce new policy following the passing of the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 (“RIA”) on March 15, 2022. With the Q&A, USCIS announces its interpretation of the sustainment period following the passing of the RIA.

Under EB-5 law, an investor filing an EB-5 immigrant visa petition (Form I-526 or I-526E Petition –“I-526 Petition”) must have invested, or be in the process of investing, the required amount of capital in a new commercial enterprise in the United States and expect to maintain that investment for not less than two years.  Once the investor has satisfied the two-year sustainment period, the investor is eligible to receive back his or her investment.

Prior to the RIA, an EB-5 investor was expected to keep their capital invested for not less than 2 years during their conditional lawful permanent residence period.   The amendment in the RIA no longer requires that the investor sustain their investment throughout their period of conditional residence.  Under the RIA provisions, an investor need only maintain their investment for 2 years.  This means that once the two year investment period has been reached, an investor may receive back his or her capital, even if the investor has not yet obtained conditional residence.

Unfortunately, the RIA does not apply to investors who filed their Form I-526 Petition prior to enactment of the RIA. Consequently, investors who filed Form I-526 Petition prior to enactment of the RIA must sustain their investment throughout the two-year period of their conditional residence to be eligible for the removal of their condition. Moreover, such pre-RIA investor’s whose capital has been returned to the New Commercial Enterprise following the repayment of a loan to a borrower (the Job Creating Entity), must still redeploy that capital for it to remain “at risk” and continue to qualify an investor until that 2-year sustainment period has passed.  This is a disadvantage to pre-RIA EB-5 investors.

Though the statute does not explicitly specify when the two-year period begins, USCIS interprets the start date as  the date that the full amount of qualifying investment is made to the New Commercial Enterprise and placed at risk under applicable requirements, including being made available to the Job Creating Entity, as appropriate.  If the investor invested more than 2 years before filing the I-526 Petition, the investment should generally still be maintained at the time the I-526 Petition is properly filed for USCIS to appropriately evaluate eligibility.

If you are considering immigrating to the U.S. via the EB-5 immigrant investment visa, make sure you talk to a qualified and experienced U.S. immigration attorney and can contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com and speak with a U.S. immigration attorney in Ho Chi Minh City, Manila and Taipei.

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office

146C7 Nguyen Van Huong St, Thao Dien Ward,
District 2, Thu Duc City
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Tel: +84 933 301 488
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com
Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ
YouTube: @EnterlineAndPartnersConsulting
Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office

LKG Tower 37th Floor
6801 Ayala Avenue
Makati City, Philippines 1226

Tel: +63 917 543 7926
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com
Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines
Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

Copyright 2023. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

Supreme Court Hands the Trump Administration a Partial Victory in Ongoing Birthright Citizenship Litigation

The United States Supreme Court has given President Donald Trump’s Executive Order (“EO”) curbing birthright citizenship a partial victory. The ruling does not impact “Birthright Citizenship” but rather restricts district court judges from issuing nation-wide (or “universal”) injunctions against Executive Orders.  In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that lower federal court judges who issued nationwide injunctions against the EO went too far and granted the Trump Administration’s request to narrow the injunctions issued in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts. While the Supreme Court’s ruling was a dramatic shift in how lower federal court judges have operated for years, the decision left enough room for challengers to the EO to prevent it from taking effect while litigation works its way through the federal court system. Specifically, the EO, which also suffered a setback by the Federal Court of Appeals will remain blocked for an additional thirty (30) days) allowing the

Read more >

When Do Sponsor Obligations End Under Form I-864?

For immigrants to the United States, the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support (“Form I-864”), is a critical part of the family-based immigration process. It is a legally enforceable contract in which a sponsor agrees to financially support the intended immigrant, helping ensure that the immigrant does not rely on certain U.S. government benefits after becoming a permanent resident. By signing Form I-864, the sponsor takes on long-term financial responsibility, but this obligation is not indefinite. The U.S. government outlines specific situations under which the sponsor’s duties come to an end. When Will These Obligations End?  A sponsors obligations under a Form I-864 end when the sponsored immigrant: A sponsor’s obligations under a Form I-864 also end if the sponsor dies. As such, the sponsor’s estate is not required to take responsibility for the sponsored immigrant following the sponsor’s death. Divorce does not terminate the responsibility, and if the sponsor dies,

Read more >

F, M and J Student Visa Interviews to Resume with Enhanced Social Media Vetting

The United States Department of State (“DOS”) has instructed Embassies and Consulates to begin accepting new F, M, and J student visa application appointments following a temporary suspension. The pause was initiated to allow DOS to implement policy changes regarding social media vetting. After the suspension, e F, M, and J student visa applicants are required to make their social media accounts public for vetting purposes. In a DOS announcement, DOS will use all information available for “visa screening and vetting to identify visa applicants who are inadmissible to the United States, including those who pose a threat to U.S. national security. Under this new guidance, we will conduct a comprehensive and thorough vetting, including online presence, of all student and exchange visitor applicants in the F, M, and J nonimmigrant classifications.” The new policy, following the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to begin screening anti-Semitic online activity posted by

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon