Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Search
Close this search box.

Trump Tweets He Will Stop All Immigration: No Need to Fear (Yet)

United States President Donald Trump tweeted late in the evening on April 20th that he intends to sign an Executive Order (“EO”) temporarily suspending immigration to the U.S. as it battles the Covid-19 pandemic and the resulting mass unemployment. While concerning for many, Enterline and Partners would like to calm the fears of its current and potential clients.

Mr. Trump is known for creating uproar through his tweeting and for being anti-immigration. Until the EO is signed, this most recent tweet should merely be taken as another of Mr. Trump’s inflammatory and anti-immigrant tweets.

However, in the event that an EO is signed, we expect an immediate challenge in federal court. Depending on the severity and the restrictiveness of the EO, it is probable that a federal court judge will issue an injunction to prevent the EO from taking immediate effect. Such an injunction could last anywhere from 3 months to several years as the case works its way through the court system. If the federal court judge rules in favor of the EO, the litigants may always appeal to the federal circuit court and quite possibly the U.S. Supreme Court.

A worst-case scenario is that the President will request a direct and immediate review by the Supreme Court and thus bypass the usual appeals process. While such requests have traditionally been reserved only for the most urgent issues, Mr. Trump has used this tactic many times during his term. Such a request was made following the administration’s new Public Charge rule, which was taken up by the Supreme Court and decided in about 5 months from the date of the federal district court’s preliminary injunction.

Because the legislative branch creates immigration laws, it is also possible for members of Congress to take action on their own and prevent the EO from taking effect.

Finally, it is also possible that any restrictions on immigration will last only as long as the pandemic itself. This will depend on the actual wording of the EO issued by Mr. Trump and how restrictive it is written. Since currently U.S. embassies and consulates throughout the world are closed and all but the most important and urgent immigration applications are on hold until further notice, such an EO will have limited effect anyway.

For now, intending immigrants should not overly worry about this tweet.

If you have more questions about the status of an immigrant visa application or qualification to immigrate, please contact us at:

 

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office
3F, IBC building
1A Cong Truong Me Linh Str.
District 1, HCMC, Vietnam
Tel: +84 933 301 488
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com
Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ
Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office
Unit 2507 Cityland 10 Tower 1
156 H.V. Dela Costa Street
Makati City, Philippines 1209
Tel: +632 5310 1491
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com
Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines
Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

Supreme Court Hands the Trump Administration a Partial Victory in Ongoing Birthright Citizenship Litigation

The United States Supreme Court has given President Donald Trump’s Executive Order (“EO”) curbing birthright citizenship a partial victory. The ruling does not impact “Birthright Citizenship” but rather restricts district court judges from issuing nation-wide (or “universal”) injunctions against Executive Orders.  In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that lower federal court judges who issued nationwide injunctions against the EO went too far and granted the Trump Administration’s request to narrow the injunctions issued in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts. While the Supreme Court’s ruling was a dramatic shift in how lower federal court judges have operated for years, the decision left enough room for challengers to the EO to prevent it from taking effect while litigation works its way through the federal court system. Specifically, the EO, which also suffered a setback by the Federal Court of Appeals will remain blocked for an additional thirty (30) days) allowing the

Read more >

When Do Sponsor Obligations End Under Form I-864?

For immigrants to the United States, the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support (“Form I-864”), is a critical part of the family-based immigration process. It is a legally enforceable contract in which a sponsor agrees to financially support the intended immigrant, helping ensure that the immigrant does not rely on certain U.S. government benefits after becoming a permanent resident. By signing Form I-864, the sponsor takes on long-term financial responsibility, but this obligation is not indefinite. The U.S. government outlines specific situations under which the sponsor’s duties come to an end. When Will These Obligations End?  A sponsors obligations under a Form I-864 end when the sponsored immigrant: A sponsor’s obligations under a Form I-864 also end if the sponsor dies. As such, the sponsor’s estate is not required to take responsibility for the sponsored immigrant following the sponsor’s death. Divorce does not terminate the responsibility, and if the sponsor dies,

Read more >

F, M and J Student Visa Interviews to Resume with Enhanced Social Media Vetting

The United States Department of State (“DOS”) has instructed Embassies and Consulates to begin accepting new F, M, and J student visa application appointments following a temporary suspension. The pause was initiated to allow DOS to implement policy changes regarding social media vetting. After the suspension, e F, M, and J student visa applicants are required to make their social media accounts public for vetting purposes. In a DOS announcement, DOS will use all information available for “visa screening and vetting to identify visa applicants who are inadmissible to the United States, including those who pose a threat to U.S. national security. Under this new guidance, we will conduct a comprehensive and thorough vetting, including online presence, of all student and exchange visitor applicants in the F, M, and J nonimmigrant classifications.” The new policy, following the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to begin screening anti-Semitic online activity posted by

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon