Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Can the Intending Immigrant Help the Sponsor Meet the Income Requirements?

In family-based immigration cases, a central component of this process is the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support (“I-864”). This legally binding contract is required to demonstrate that the intending immigrant (the “Beneficiary”) has adequate financial support from the sponsoring family member (the “Sponsor”) through income and/or assets, and therefore the Beneficiary is unlikely to become a public charge (rely on government welfare for support). Through the completion of Form I-864, the Sponsor assumes substantial financial obligations enforceable under U.S. law.

If the Sponsor does not have enough income or assets, under certain conditions, the Beneficiary’s income or assets may be used to help meet the Sponsor’s financial requirement. If the Beneficiary is the Sponsor’s spouse, their income may be counted if it will continue from the same source after obtaining lawful permanent resident status.

If the Beneficiary is another relative, such as a child, parent or brother or sister, two criteria must be satisfied:

  • The income must be expected to continue from the same source after the Beneficiary becomes a lawful permanent resident; and
  • The Beneficiary must reside in the Sponsor’s household at the time of filing.

In both scenarios, supporting documentation must be provided to establish that the income and/or assets meet these requirements.

In addition to demonstrating their own financial resources, the Beneficiary can contribute to the I-864 by demonstrating their own skills, education, work experience, and ability to find employment.

Comparison Table – Conditions for Counting Intending Immigrant Income

Spouse as intending immigrantOther relative (child, parent, sibling)
Income continues from same sourceRequiredRequired
Residing in same household as sponsorNot requiredRequired
Supporting documentation neededYesYes

Documentation Required to Support the Claim

In both situations, supporting documentation must be provided:

To prove income continues from the same source:

  • Employment contract or letter from a U.S. employer confirming continued remote employment after entry
  • Most recent tax returns and pay stubs
  • Evidence that the income source will remain active after U.S. admission

To prove co-residence (for relatives other than spouses):

  • Evidence of the same U.S. address at time of filing
  • Utility bills, lease agreements, or other household documentation

To demonstrate skills and employment prospects:

  • Academic degrees and professional certifications
  • Employment history documentation
  • Evidence of employment prospects in the United States

Frequently Asked Questions

Can the intending immigrant’s income be used to help the sponsor meet the I-864 income requirements?

Yes – but only under specific conditions. If the intending immigrant is the sponsor’s spouse, their income may be counted if it will continue from the same source after they become a lawful permanent resident. If the intending immigrant is another relative (child, parent, or sibling), two conditions must both be met: the income continues from the same source, and the intending immigrant is residing in the same household as the sponsor at the time of filing.

Can income from employment in Vietnam be counted toward the I-864?

Only if that income will continue from the same source after the intending immigrant enters the United States and becomes a lawful permanent resident. If the intending immigrant has a remote work contract with a U.S. company that will continue after U.S. entry, that income may be considered. Income from employment in Vietnam that will end upon U.S. entry typically cannot be counted.

What can the intending immigrant do to help the I-864 if they have no current income?

The intending immigrant can support the petition by demonstrating skills, education, work experience, and the ability to find employment in the United States. In addition, if the sponsor’s income is insufficient, options include: using qualifying assets to offset the income shortfall; having an eligible household member sign a Form I-864A to pool income; or having a qualified joint sponsor sign a separate I-864.

Can a child beneficiary living in Vietnam have their income counted toward the I-864?

No – not if the child is currently living in Vietnam at the time of filing. For relatives other than spouses, both conditions must be satisfied simultaneously: income continuing from the same source and residing in the same household as the sponsor in the United States. A child living in Vietnam does not satisfy the co-residence requirement.

What other options does a sponsor have if their income alone is insufficient for the I-864?

There are three main alternatives: (1) Qualifying assets (real estate, savings, investments) may be used to offset income shortfalls at a specific conversion ratio; (2) An eligible household member may sign Form I-864A to pool their income with the sponsor’s; (3) A qualified joint sponsor may sign a separate I-864 – the joint sponsor does not need to be a relative but must independently satisfy the full income requirements on their own.

If you have questions about the I-864 Affidavit of Support, contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com.

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office

146C7 Nguyen Van Huong St, Thao Dien Ward,
District 2, Thu Duc City
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Tel: +84 933 301 488
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com
Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ
YouTube: @EnterlineAndPartnersConsulting
Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office

LKG Tower 37th Floor  
6801 Ayala Avenue   
Makati City, Philippines 1226  

Tel: +63 917 543 7926
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com
Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines
Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

Copyright 2025. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

contact us today for more information

Latest News

DOS Releases Fact Sheet On Establishing Birth Tourism Prevention Task Force

The United States Department of State (“DOS”) has released a fact sheet on establishing a new Birth Tourism Prevention Task Force (“Task Force”) that reviews nonimmigrant visa holders activities specifically to identify those who have engaged in birth tourism and to revoke visas for those who engage or facilitate in the practice. The Task Force, which is being overseen by DOS Secretary Marco Rubio, will have a number of functions including the following: According to the Task Force, birth tourism has become a for-profit industry with facilitators marketing the practice as doulas, midwives, or wellness advocates while advertising “birth in the U.S.” services complete with visa coaching and medical arrangements. The Task Force further notes that some facilitators have gone as far as forging medical records, coaching clients to conceal their true travel purposes, and avoid paying hospital bills complete with online marketing promises of “automatic citizenship” for their child

Read more >

Regional Center Amendments and Record Keeping

Regional Centers participating in the EB-5 Immigrant Investor program are subject to ongoing compliance requirements designed to maintain transparency and accountability. These requirements include notifying the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) of significant organizational changes, maintaining records for a specified period, and cooperating with government audits. Understanding these obligations is important for Regional Centers as they continue to operate and support EB-5 investment projects. Notification Requirements for Significant Changes A Regional Center is required to notify the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) of significant proposed changes to its organizational structure, ownership, or administration. This includes the sale of the Regional Center, as well as other arrangements that would result in individuals who were not previously subject to the requirements under subparagraph (H) (INA§203(b)(5)(H)) becoming involved with the Regional Center. In such cases, the Regional Center must provide notice to the DHS no later than 120 days before the significant

Read more >

New USCIS Policy Aims to Reduce Frivolous and Incomplete Filings

The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) has amended a previous policy during the Biden Administration which encouraged adjudicating officers to issue a Request for Evidence (“RFE”) before denying an immigration benefit even if the benefit being sought was filed incomplete, the requestor failed to demonstrate eligibility for the benefit being sought, or did not provide initial evidence clearly required at the time of submission. According to USCIS, the previous policy allowed for frivolous or substantially incomplete filings which slowed processing times and led to increased operational costs. The new policy, which was announced on August 5, 2026, restores an adjudicating officer’s full discretion in denying an immigration benefit without first issuing an RFE or a Notice of Intent to Deny (“NOID”). Updated policy highlights include the following:  The revised policy is effective immediately and applies to immigration benefits that remain pending with USCIS or filed on or after

Read more >
Zalo
Phone
WhatsApp
Messenger
Messenger
WhatsApp
Phone
Zalo