Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

U.S. Federal Court Judge Temporarily Blocks Presidential Proclamation on Requiring Immigrants to Obtain Health Insurance

A U.S. Federal District Court judge has granted a temporary restraining order (TRO) against U.S. President Donald Trump’s proclamation requiring intending immigrants to obtain health insurance within thirty (30) days upon their arrival in the United States or be able to show that they have enough money to pay for “reasonably foreseeable medical costs.”

Judge Michael Simon of the U.S. District Court of Oregon issued a 28-day TRO which prevented the rule from taking effect on November 3, 2019. The lawsuit, filed by several advocacy groups to block the incoming law argued that the proclamation could prevent hundreds of thousands of prospective immigrants from entering the United States.

In his 18-page order, Judge Simon wrote that the potential damage to immigrants and their families justified the TRO. “Facing a likely risk of being separated from their family members and a delay in obtaining a visa to which family members would otherwise be entitled is irreparable harm,” the order stated.

Trump’s proclamation requiring incoming immigrants to obtain health insurance out of concern that they would not be able to pay for their medical expenses appears to be at odds with healthcare policy experts. According to Leighton Ku, director of the Center of Health Policy Research at the George Washington University, recent immigrants without issuance accounted for less than one-tenth of 1 percent of U.S. medical expenditures in 2017.

 

For more information, contact us at

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING
Ad: 3F, IBC building, 1A Cong Truong Me Linh Str, District 1, HCMC.
Tel: 0933 301 488
CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

contact us today for more information

Latest News

The U.S. EB-5 Immigrant Investor Regional Center Program: History, Temporary Status, and Expiration Timeline

The EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 (“RIA”) reauthorized and reformed the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program, a U.S. immigration program that offers foreign nationals a pathway to U.S. permanent residency through investment in American businesses that create jobs. A significant component of this program is the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Regional Center Program, which allows investors to consolidate their resources through designated Regional Centers and invest in projects that drive economic growth and job creation. The Regional Center Program was introduced by Congress in 1992 as a pilot program to enhance the EB-5 visa classification. It was classified as a pilot program – a short-term “test” program – to allow for more flexibility for job creation based on the minimum investment.  Investments may be made into businesses or “projects” sponsored by Regional Centers, which are approved by the United States Citizenship Immigration Services.  Typically, these Regional Centers manage or oversee

Read more >

Vietnamese Names Listed in a Different Order on U.S. Visas and Green Cards

United States government posts have frequently listed Vietnamese citizens’ names on government documents in a different order such as on visas and Form I-551 (“Green Cards”.) This often happens because Vietnamese passports list names in the order of last name (or “family name” or “surname”) followed by the middle name and then the first name. This traditional naming style can cause significant confusion regarding the proper Vietnamese visa name order. Moreover, some Vietnamese individuals have more than one middle or first name, resulting in four names represented on a passport, which further complicates the data entry for U.S. officials. Regional Accuracy: Why Where You Apply Matters For U.S. government posts in Vietnam, such as the U.S. Consulate in Ho Chi Minh City and the U.S. Embassy in Hanoi, this is usually not a problem. Immigrant and nonimmigrant visas issued by these offices are normally correct because the consular officers have

Read more >

Visa Retrogression Explained: Differences Between Retrogression and Backlogs

Visa retrogression is a situation where the Department of State (“DOS”) adjusts the Final Action Date and Dates For Filing backwards on the DOS monthly Visa Bulletin. This occurs when the demand for immigrant visas in a specific visa category exceeds the estimated supply, causing applicants who were previously eligible to wait a longer period of time.  Understanding the distinction between a visa backlog and visa retrogression is critical for immigrant visa applicants navigating the Family-Based (“FB”) or Employment-Based (“EB”) preference categories. How the Visa Bulletin and Priority Dates Work To understand visa retrogression, you must understand the “Priority Date.” Many visa categories have a limited number of visas available every year. When there is greater demand for a visa category than there are visas available, the U.S. government places visa applicants on a waiting list; the Visa Bulletin based on the applicants Priority Date.  This is effectively your place

Read more >
Zalo
Phone
WhatsApp
Messenger
Messenger
WhatsApp
Phone
Zalo