Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

What is Lawful Source of Funds and Path of Funds for an EB-5 Immigrant Investor?

The investment capital that an EB-5 Investor may use for his or her investment, called the “lawful source of funds” (“SOF”), can come from any source as long as the investor can prove that the capital or funds were obtained lawfully. Some common SOF are salary and bonus income, dividends from a company, stock options earned, or investment income. Easily the most common SOF, in about 80% of cases, is an investor using a property owned by him or her or a family member such as a home or an apartment.

In this instance, the investor liquidates the funds for the investment by selling the home or obtaining a mortgage loan against the property. There is still a need to source what we call the “seed money” which is to identify how the investor lawfully obtained the property, although the further back in time the acquisition occurred, the less documentation is usually required because it is understandable that records may not exist going back many years.

The funds must be personally invested into a qualifying business, called the New Commercial Enterprise (“NCE”) by the investor. For example, the funds cannot originate from an investor’s business which he or she would remit straight into the NCE. The investor must first own and control the funds at some point before investing. Thus, if an investor wants to use accumulated capital from an existing business, he or she must take a distribution, pay whatever tax liability might be applicable, and then personally invest the capital into the NCE under his or her name, although in some situations a transfer agent can act to remit the funds on behalf of the investor.

There are some ways that an investor might “borrow” capital from a company but these can be complex and generally we prefer to avoid them.

If an investor has earned salary and distributions over many years, we would need to show receipt of such funds and then a link to where the funds are before the transfer begins. Few investors leave sizable sums of salary or bonus income sitting in a savings account. Most investors will deploy funds it into various income earning products so it will be necessary to trace those funds which are being liquidated to be used for the investment.

The second critical factor is the path of funds. The investor must be able to trace the path of the funds from the source all the way to the remittance into the NCE account.

In transferring the funds to the NCE, accumulating the funds into the investor’s account and then remitting to the NCE account should be clearly documented. In countries with currency exchange and remittance restrictions, this can be a significant obstacle. Failure in the transfer of funds is one of the most common reasons for a denied I-526 petition.

 

Contact Enterline and Partners for more information on the EB-5 immigrant investor visa.

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office
Ad: 3F, IBC building, 1A Cong Truong Me Linh Str., District 1, HCMC, Vietnam
Tel: +84 933 301 488
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com
Facebook: Enterline and Partners-Đầu Tư Định Cư tại Mỹ
Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office
Ad: Unit 2507 Cityland 10 Tower 1, 156 H.V. Dela Costa Street, Makati City, Philippines 1209
Tel: +632 5310 1491
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com
Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines
Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

successful i-130 dcf approval hcmc

Enterline and Partners Succesfully Expedites I-130 Petition with Direct Consular Filing at the U.S. Consulate in Ho Chi Minh City

Enterline and Partners is pleased to announce that our attorneys have successfully represented another client with Direct Consular Filing (“DCF”) of  an I-130 Petition for Alien Relative (“I-130 Petition”) at the U.S. Consulate in Ho Chi Minh City (“Consulate.”) Our clients, a U.S. citizen and Vietnamese citizen, approached us after the U.S. citizen received a job offer which required his immediate relocation back to the United States. Following our consultation session in which we thoroughly discussed how DCF is adjudicated as well as advising that it remains discretionary, the couple decided to proceed and engaged our office to file the initial DCF request. Our team worked diligently in gathering all of the required and supplemental documentation needed before the DCF request could be filed. Once everything was finalized, we submitted the request. Less than a week later, the Consulate approved our DCF request and scheduled the client to file the

Read more >
supreme court

Supreme Court Hands the Trump Administration a Partial Victory in Ongoing Birthright Citizenship Litigation

The United States Supreme Court has given President Donald Trump’s Executive Order (“EO”) curbing birthright citizenship a partial victory. The ruling does not impact “Birthright Citizenship” but rather restricts district court judges from issuing nation-wide (or “universal”) injunctions against Executive Orders.  In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that lower federal court judges who issued nationwide injunctions against the EO went too far and granted the Trump Administration’s request to narrow the injunctions issued in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts. While the Supreme Court’s ruling was a dramatic shift in how lower federal court judges have operated for years, the decision left enough room for challengers to the EO to prevent it from taking effect while litigation works its way through the federal court system. Specifically, the EO, which also suffered a setback by the Federal Court of Appeals will remain blocked for an additional thirty (30) days) allowing the

Read more >
form i0854

When Do Sponsor Obligations End Under Form I-864?

For immigrants to the United States, the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support (“Form I-864”), is a critical part of the family-based immigration process. It is a legally enforceable contract in which a sponsor agrees to financially support the intended immigrant, helping ensure that the immigrant does not rely on certain U.S. government benefits after becoming a permanent resident. By signing Form I-864, the sponsor takes on long-term financial responsibility, but this obligation is not indefinite. The U.S. government outlines specific situations under which the sponsor’s duties come to an end. When Will These Obligations End?  A sponsors obligations under a Form I-864 end when the sponsored immigrant: A sponsor’s obligations under a Form I-864 also end if the sponsor dies. As such, the sponsor’s estate is not required to take responsibility for the sponsored immigrant following the sponsor’s death. Divorce does not terminate the responsibility, and if the sponsor dies,

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon