Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Search
Close this search box.

Are K-1 Fiancé Visas Exempted Under Trump’s Immigration Ban?

Following U.S. President Donald Trump’s April 22nd Executive Order (“EO”) as the “Proclamation Suspending Entry of Aliens Who Present a Risk to the U.S. Labor Market Following the Coronavirus Outbreak”, restricting certain applicants from receiving their immigrant visas for at least 60 days, many of our clients have inquired if their K-1 visas are exempted from the EO ban. Because a K-1 visa is classified as a non-immigrant visa under U.S. Immigration law but treated by the U.S. Department of State consular officers as an immigrant visa, the U.S. immigration lawyers at Enterline and Partners are of the opinion that K-1 visa applicants are not banned.

On June 22nd, President Trump amended the EO and thereby suspended the issuance of certain non-immigrant visas, and extended the original ban until December 31st. The amended EO made no reference to whether K-1 visa applicants would be prevented from applying for their visas for the EO’s duration.

While it is not expressly clear, it is reasonable to presume that K-1 visas are exempted from Trump’s immigration ban. Along with being noticeably absent from both the April 22nd and June 22nd proclamations, the U.S. Department of State Monthly Nonimmigrant Visa Statistics for May 2020 reports that despite the suspension of routine visa appointments at both the U.S. Embassy in Manila and the U.S. Consulate in Ho Chi Minh City, there were a few K-1 visa issued in both the Philippines and Vietnam. For example, the May 2020 Nonimmigrant Visa Issuance by Post and Visa Class shows two K-1 visas issued in Manila and eight issued in Ho Chi Minh City. Likewise, the May 2020 Nonimmigrant Visa Issuances by Nationality and Visa Class also shows four K-1 visas issued to Philippine citizens and eight K-1 visas issued to Vietnamese citizens. However, these applicants may have been interviewed or visa issued prior to the April 22 proclamation but were not reported until May.

If K-1 visas are designated as non-immigrant visas and not expressly banned under Trump’s proclamation, K-1 applicants should be allowed to proceed for their interviews when local travel restrictions and movement control orders are also lifted and when the Consulates reopen.

For more information, contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com and speak with one of our U.S. immigration lawyers in Ho Chi Minh City, Manila and Taipei.

 

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office
Suite 601, 6th Floor
Saigon Tower
29 Le Duan Street
Ben Nghe Ward, District 1
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Tel: +84 933 301 488
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com
Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ
Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office
Unit 2507 Cityland 10 Tower 1
156 H.V. Dela Costa Street
Makati City, Philippines 1209
Tel: +632 5310 1491
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com
Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines
Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

Copyright 2020. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.
CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

Supreme Court Hands the Trump Administration a Partial Victory in Ongoing Birthright Citizenship Litigation

The United States Supreme Court has given President Donald Trump’s Executive Order (“EO”) curbing birthright citizenship a partial victory. The ruling does not impact “Birthright Citizenship” but rather restricts district court judges from issuing nation-wide (or “universal”) injunctions against Executive Orders.  In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that lower federal court judges who issued nationwide injunctions against the EO went too far and granted the Trump Administration’s request to narrow the injunctions issued in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts. While the Supreme Court’s ruling was a dramatic shift in how lower federal court judges have operated for years, the decision left enough room for challengers to the EO to prevent it from taking effect while litigation works its way through the federal court system. Specifically, the EO, which also suffered a setback by the Federal Court of Appeals will remain blocked for an additional thirty (30) days) allowing the

Read more >

When Do Sponsor Obligations End Under Form I-864?

For immigrants to the United States, the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support (“Form I-864”), is a critical part of the family-based immigration process. It is a legally enforceable contract in which a sponsor agrees to financially support the intended immigrant, helping ensure that the immigrant does not rely on certain U.S. government benefits after becoming a permanent resident. By signing Form I-864, the sponsor takes on long-term financial responsibility, but this obligation is not indefinite. The U.S. government outlines specific situations under which the sponsor’s duties come to an end. When Will These Obligations End?  A sponsors obligations under a Form I-864 end when the sponsored immigrant: A sponsor’s obligations under a Form I-864 also end if the sponsor dies. As such, the sponsor’s estate is not required to take responsibility for the sponsored immigrant following the sponsor’s death. Divorce does not terminate the responsibility, and if the sponsor dies,

Read more >

F, M and J Student Visa Interviews to Resume with Enhanced Social Media Vetting

The United States Department of State (“DOS”) has instructed Embassies and Consulates to begin accepting new F, M, and J student visa application appointments following a temporary suspension. The pause was initiated to allow DOS to implement policy changes regarding social media vetting. After the suspension, e F, M, and J student visa applicants are required to make their social media accounts public for vetting purposes. In a DOS announcement, DOS will use all information available for “visa screening and vetting to identify visa applicants who are inadmissible to the United States, including those who pose a threat to U.S. national security. Under this new guidance, we will conduct a comprehensive and thorough vetting, including online presence, of all student and exchange visitor applicants in the F, M, and J nonimmigrant classifications.” The new policy, following the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to begin screening anti-Semitic online activity posted by

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon