Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Has Trump Finally Overstepped His Abuse of Executive Authority?

Editor’s Note: this article was written after the lawsuit discussed herein but not published before the DHS indicated to the Federal Court judge on July 14th that it would rescind the policy.

In a recent American Immigration Lawyers Association (“AILA”) webinar, the esteemed Ira Kurzban, unquestionably regarded as the godfather of immigration litigation, commented that every single day of Trump’s administration, he has made some change to law or regulation by issuing Executive Orders or directives or by other means.  This is most evident and publicized in his attack on legal immigration, circumventing the laws and regulations passed by Congress that provide for an organized necessary immigration system.  That the GOP has allowed him to do so without check is telling of how far to the right the Republican party has swung.  But Trump may have finally overstepped his authority.

Last week the United States Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) announced a new policy prohibiting foreign students from studying in the United States if a college or university shifted to full-time online classes because of the COVID-19 pandemic.  Foreign students in the U.S. on F-1 and M-1 visas enrolled in any institution that moved all its classes online would be required to leave the United States.  Immediately Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology sued in federal court to try to block this policy.  On July 13th attorneys general in 17 states and the District of Columbia filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration over this same policy, including a request for an injunction to stop the policy from becoming effective while the case is being considered by the court.

Forcing foreign students to leave the U.S. could have a significant economic impact on the United States. According to the Institute of International Education, the total foreign student population reached 1.1 million in the 2018- 2019 academic year and comprised roughly 5.5 percent of the total higher education community. The U.S. Department of Commerce noted that foreign students contributed nearly $45 billion to the 2018 U.S. economy as well as offering cultural diversity to campus life and enriching academics in many ways.

The lawsuit is based on several key factors. The directive was arbitrary and capricious because it failed to offer a reason for its reversal of prior policy, the rule imposes large financial and administrative burdens on colleges and universities, and the directive would interfere with reopening guidelines that state governments have already issued.

Initially filed by the state of Massachusetts, 16 other states joined the lawsuit and includes declarations from more than 40 schools impacted by the policy, including the University of Massachusetts, Boston University, Yale, the University of Connecticut, and Tufts University.

Lawsuits filed against Trump’s policies and executive orders are ubiquitous.  It is possible that almost every single order or policy change that he has made has resulted in a lawsuit.  But in the field of legal immigration, an organized challenge by a significant number of states is notable.  With fall semesters scheduled to begin in as little as 5 to 7 weeks, foreign students in the U.S. and those institutions that rely on such students urgently need an injunction to ensure stability to all parties during the resolution of this lawsuit.

If you have questions about the policy or the lawsuit, or what you as a foreign student can do to protect your status, contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com and speak with one of our U.S. immigration lawyers in Ho Chi Minh City, Manila and Taipei.

 

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office
Suite 601, 6th Floor
Saigon Tower
29 Le Duan Street
Ben Nghe Ward, District 1
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Tel: +84 933 301 488
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com
Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ
Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office
Unit 2507 Cityland 10 Tower 1
156 H.V. Dela Costa Street
Makati City, Philippines 1209
Tel: +632 5310 1491
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com
Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines
Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

Copyright 2020. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.
CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

contact us today for more information

Latest News

visa K1, CR-1

K-1 Fiancé(e)’ Visa vs. CR-1 Spousal Visa: Which is the Right Path For Your Vietnamese Fiance(é) Or Spouse?

For many American and Vietnamese couples looking to immigrate to the United States, a major question is whether they should apply for a K-1 fiancé(é) visa or a CR-1 spousal visa. While both lead to lawful permanent residence status (“Green Card”), they work very differently. A K-1 fiancé(e) visa allows a Vietnamese fiance(é) to enter the United States so the couple can marry within ninety (90) days upon the Vietnamese fiance(é)’s arrival. A CR-1 spousal visa allows a Vietnamese spouse to enter the United States with an immigrant visa and be granted CR-1 status if the couple is married for less than two (2) years. The right choice depends on many factors such as your relationship status, wedding plans, timeline, budget, and long-term priorities.  We compare the K-1 fiancé(e) and CR-1 options for American and Vietnamese couples including eligibility, timelines, filing fees, work authorization, international travel, and common situations where

Read more >

Passport Revocation for Child Support Arrears

On May 7, 2026, the United States Department of State (“DOS”) announced that it will begin revoking U.S. passports for certain individuals with outstanding child support arrears. Under existing federal regulations (22 CFR §51.62) and DOS policy guidance (7 FAM 1754), DOS may deny or revoke a U.S. passport when the Department of Health and Human Services (“DHHS”) certifies that an individual owes more than US$2,500 in child support. Although this authority has existed for years, the announcement signals increased enforcement efforts. According to recent reports, the initial phase may focus on individuals with arrears exceeding US$100,000, with broader enforcement potentially expanding to all individuals owing more than US$2,500. Once revoked, a passport may no longer be used for international travel. In most cases, the individual will not become eligible for a new passport until DHHS certifies that the child support arrears have been resolved. If an individual is overseas

Read more >

Protection from Regional Center Program Expiration – Grandfathering before September 30, 2026

The EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 (“RIA”) introduced several important changes to the EB-5 Regional Center Program. One of the most important protections for investors is commonly referred to as the “grandfathering” provision found in Section 108 of the RIA, titled “Protection from Expired Legislation.” Since its creation in 1993, the EB-5 Regional Center Program has always been a pilot, or “test”, program.  Historically, it has required periodic reauthorization by the United States Congress. In the past, temporary lapses in authorization created uncertainty for investors with pending I-526E, Immigrant Petition by Regional Center Investor petitions. Many investors were at risk that USCIS would stop processing their cases if the Regional Center Program expired before petition approval or visa issuance. To address these concerns, Congress included additional protections in the RIA intended to help investors continue moving forward with their immigration process even if the Regional Center Program expires

Read more >
Zalo
Phone
WhatsApp
Messenger
Messenger
WhatsApp
Phone
Zalo