Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Search
Close this search box.

What is the Two-Year Meeting Requirement Waiver for an I-129F Petition for Alien Fiance?

One key requirement for an I-129F Petition approval and proceeding K-1 non-immigrant visa is that the U.S. citizen and foreign fiance must have physically met within 2 years prior to filing the I-129 Petition with the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS). Those who have not satisfied the two year meeting requirement and would still like to file an I-129F may do so provided USCIS waives this requirement.

What Must be Provided with the I-129F Petition?

The couple must provide evidence of a physical meeting such as:

  • U.S. Citizen’s Passport Showing Admission Stamps Visiting His or Her Foreign Fiancee;
  • Airline Tickets
  • Hotel Reservations
  • Restaurant Receipts
  • Pictures of the Couple Together and with Friends and Family

When is the Waiver Submitted?

Applying for a waiver must be done in conjunction with the original I-129F Petition filing. There are two scenarios of how a two-year meeting requirement waiver may be granted:

  • If meeting between the petitioner and beneficiary would result in “extreme hardship” to the petitioner;
  • If such a meeting would violate long-standing customs of the beneficiary’s culture.

Extreme Hardship to the Petitioner

USCIS interprets extreme hardship to the petitioner as showing that it is close to physically impossible for the petitioner to be able to meet the beneficiary. For example, the petitioner not being financially able to make a trip to meet the beneficiary or the petitioner not being able to have enough time off work to meet the beneficiary is not viewed as extreme hardship. However, if the petitioner is suffering from a medical condition in which they are physically unable to travel may be seen as extreme hardship. At the same time, the petitioner being unable to travel because they are incarcerated or on parole is also not seen as extreme hardship.

Meeting Prior to Marriage Would Violate of Long-Standing Customs of the Beneficiaries Culture

In situations where it is physically possible for the couple to meet but doing so would violate long-standing customs of the beneficiary’s culture, a waiver may be sought. However, proving that such a meeting would violate long-standing cultural traditions must be backed up by expert evidence. One example may be that in certain cultures, it is a long-established tradition for a couple not to have physically met until their wedding night.

 

For more information, contact us:

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office
Suite 601, 6th Floor
Saigon Tower
29 Le Duan Street
Ben Nghe Ward, District 1
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Tel: +84 933 301 488

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

 

Manila, Philippines Office
Unit 2507 Cityland 10 Tower 1
156 H.V. Dela Costa Street
Makati City, Philippines 1209

Tel: +632 5310 1491

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

 

Article last updated: 18th March 2021

Copyright 2021. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

What is a Joint Sponsor for a Form I-864 Affidavit of Support?

A Joint Sponsor for Form I-864, Affidavit of Support, is an individual who agrees to share the financial responsibility for sponsoring an immigrant when the primary sponsor (the Petitioner) does not meet the minimum income requirements. The joint sponsor must meet certain eligibility criteria and file their own Form I-864 in addition to the primary sponsor’s form. What is the Eligibility Criteria for a Joint Sponsor? No Obligation to Be Related: Unlike the primary sponsor, the joint sponsor does not need to be related to the immigrant. What are the Responsibilities of a Joint Sponsor? When signing Form I-864, the joint sponsor agrees to: What Are the Filing Process for a Joint Sponsor? Multiple joint sponsors may be involved if needed. Each joint sponsor however must independently meet the income requirements for their own household size and file their own I-864. For more information, please contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com. ENTERLINE

Read more >

President-Elect Trump’s Mass Deportation Begins to Take Hold

During the 2024 campaign,  former president and candidate Donald J. Trump promised mass deportation for millions on undocumented migrants in the United States. It appears that the campaign pledges are beginning to take hold. Last week, President-elect Trump named Thomas Homan as the “Border Tsar.” Homan, a former police officer and immigration official who previously served during the Obama administration and the first Trump administration as Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director has made it clear that mass deportation will be effectively carried out. “We have a mandate. I think the American people just gave President Trump a mandate. That’s why he’s elected – to secure the border, save lives, and deport people, especially national security threats and public safety threats,” said Homan. Homan commented that the immediate focus will be those in the country illegally with criminal convictions or charges. “It’s not going to be a massive sweep of neighborhoods.

Read more >

Federal Judge Strikes Down Parole-in-Place Program

A U.S. Federal Court Judge has struck down Parole-in-Place following an earlier decision granting the State of Texas and fifteen (15) other states an administrative stay two months ago. Judge J. Campbell Barker of the Eastern District of Texas ruled that the program, which would fast-track permanent residency to certain undocumented immigrants to obtain lawful permanent residents who are spouses and stepchildren of U.S. citizens, “exceeded its statutory authority and is not in accordance with the law.”  Judge Barker further added that the program “focuses on the wrong thing, in identifying ‘significant public benefits’- the benefits of aliens’ new legal status – rather than their presence in the country.”  At the time of publishing this article, it is unclear whether the Biden Administration will appeal Judge Barker’s ruling.  For more information on this ruling, please contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com. ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING    Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office    146C7

Read more >