Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Search
Close this search box.

Status of the EB-5 Regional Center Program in January 2022

Six months have passed since the EB-5 Regional Center Program (“Program”) expired and Congress has still not taken any steps towards its renewal.  Originally enacted in 1993, the Program was a pilot, or test, program and was never made permanent.    The Program had been extended on a regular basis for 28 years until June 30, 2021 when it lapsed without extension.

As a result of the lapse, tens of thousands of investors and their family members are without any visa category (I5 and R5) to process their immigrant visas and obtain conditional permanent residence.

The original EB-5 visa category, commonly referred to as “EB-5 Direct”, was signed into law in 1990.  It is permanent law and remains available.   Any investor that made an investment into a new business which can show at least 10 jobs were or are likely to be directly created by his or her investment can still qualify for their “Direct” EB-5 visas.

Unfortunately for approximately 97% of EB-5 investors – those who participated in the Program – there is no clear relief in sight. While it is rumored that the Program will be reinstated in February when the U.S. Federal budget is extended, this is mostly EB-5 stakeholder’s wishful thinking and reaching for hope.  This is amplified by many stakeholders, mostly immigration agents that receive fees from EB-5 businesses, and EB-5 regional center businesses that have a financial interest to keep potential investors focused on the possible future reinstatement of the Program and not decide to invest into a business that would qualify them for EB-5 Direct.  The same rumors circulated before the end of the U.S. fiscal year on September 30, 2021, and again when the U.S. Federal budget was extended to December 2021.   Sadly, there are strong differences of opinion among members of Congress whether the Program should return, and strong differences of opinion among stakeholders about in what form it should return.

I personally think there will not be consensus, and as a result, there will not be a new Program this February.

A silver lining is that there is strong support for a special law that would help all investors and family members who made an investment before the expiration of the Program.  There is at least one group that is working to submit a bill in Congress that would do this.

Some would argue that those investors who decided to invest under the Program knew the risk that it may not be extended.  While that is true, to offer an immigrant investment visa program designed to attract billions of dollars of investment into the U.S., then accept applications for investors to immigrate, and then deny them that benefit because a few individual Congressmen do not like the program, is un-American.   The U.S. should honor its commitment to these foreign national investors who risked making a considerable investment to obtain the “American Dream”.

I am of the opinion that sometime soon in 2022 such a bill will be passed into law, so if you are an investor waiting, hopefully the wait will not be much longer.

If you have questions about the EB-5 immigrant investor visa and the Program, contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com and speak with one of our U.S. immigration lawyers in Ho Chi Minh City, Manila and Taipei.

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office

Suite 601, 6th Floor, Saigon Tower
29 Le Duan Street
Ben Nghe Ward, District 1
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Tel: +84 933 301 488

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ

Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office

LKG Tower 37th Floor
6801 Ayala Avenue
Makati City, Philippines 1226

Tel: +632 5310 1491

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines

Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

Copyright 2021. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

Supreme Court Hands the Trump Administration a Partial Victory in Ongoing Birthright Citizenship Litigation

The United States Supreme Court has given President Donald Trump’s Executive Order (“EO”) curbing birthright citizenship a partial victory. The ruling does not impact “Birthright Citizenship” but rather restricts district court judges from issuing nation-wide (or “universal”) injunctions against Executive Orders.  In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that lower federal court judges who issued nationwide injunctions against the EO went too far and granted the Trump Administration’s request to narrow the injunctions issued in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts. While the Supreme Court’s ruling was a dramatic shift in how lower federal court judges have operated for years, the decision left enough room for challengers to the EO to prevent it from taking effect while litigation works its way through the federal court system. Specifically, the EO, which also suffered a setback by the Federal Court of Appeals will remain blocked for an additional thirty (30) days) allowing the

Read more >

When Do Sponsor Obligations End Under Form I-864?

For immigrants to the United States, the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support (“Form I-864”), is a critical part of the family-based immigration process. It is a legally enforceable contract in which a sponsor agrees to financially support the intended immigrant, helping ensure that the immigrant does not rely on certain U.S. government benefits after becoming a permanent resident. By signing Form I-864, the sponsor takes on long-term financial responsibility, but this obligation is not indefinite. The U.S. government outlines specific situations under which the sponsor’s duties come to an end. When Will These Obligations End?  A sponsors obligations under a Form I-864 end when the sponsored immigrant: A sponsor’s obligations under a Form I-864 also end if the sponsor dies. As such, the sponsor’s estate is not required to take responsibility for the sponsored immigrant following the sponsor’s death. Divorce does not terminate the responsibility, and if the sponsor dies,

Read more >

F, M and J Student Visa Interviews to Resume with Enhanced Social Media Vetting

The United States Department of State (“DOS”) has instructed Embassies and Consulates to begin accepting new F, M, and J student visa application appointments following a temporary suspension. The pause was initiated to allow DOS to implement policy changes regarding social media vetting. After the suspension, e F, M, and J student visa applicants are required to make their social media accounts public for vetting purposes. In a DOS announcement, DOS will use all information available for “visa screening and vetting to identify visa applicants who are inadmissible to the United States, including those who pose a threat to U.S. national security. Under this new guidance, we will conduct a comprehensive and thorough vetting, including online presence, of all student and exchange visitor applicants in the F, M, and J nonimmigrant classifications.” The new policy, following the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to begin screening anti-Semitic online activity posted by

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon