Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

What is Domicile and How Does it Relate to the Affidavit of Support?

We have previously written about the Form I-864 Affidavit of Support, the contract between a Petitioner or “Sponsor” and the U.S. Government showing that the Sponsor has enough income or assets to financially provide for the Sponsor’s household family members and the intending immigrant(s).   The Affidavit of Support legally binds the Sponsor to provide such financial support.  If the Petitioner/Sponsor is unable to demonstrate enough income or assets, other persons may be a “Joint Sponsor” for the intending immigrant(s).

To qualify as a Sponsor or Joint Sponsor, an individual must be a natural person, not a company, who:

  1. Is a U.S. citizen, national, or lawful permanent resident (“LPR”) of the United States (including conditional residents);
  2. Is at least 18 years of age;
  3. Filed the Form I-130 Petition which forms the basis for the visa application (not a Joint Sponsor); and
  4. Is “domiciled” in any of the 50 States of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any territory or possession of the United States.

If the Petitioner does not meet the qualifying criteria to be a Sponsor (for example, under 18 years of age or not domiciled in the United States), the intending immigrant(s) will require a Joint Sponsor.  Any Joint Sponsor must also meet the above requirements.

The term “domicile” means the place where a Sponsor has his or her principal “residence” in the United States, with the intention to maintain that residence for the foreseeable future.  A Petitioner who is maintaining a principal residence outside the United States cannot normally claim a U.S. domicile and would be ineligible to submit a Form I-864 Affidavit of Support.  If a Petitioner cannot satisfy the domicile requirement, the Petitioner fails to qualify as a Sponsor and a Joint Sponsor cannot be accepted.   The intending immigrant(s) visa application(s) would then be refused.

In certain cases, a LPR living abroad temporarily may be considered to have a domicile in the United States if he or she has taken action to preserve his or her residence.  Moreover, a U.S. citizen living abroad working for qualified employers, such as the U.S. government, a U.S. company or subsidiary, public international organizations, or an organization engaged in ministerial work, may still be considered to be domiciled in the United States.

If a Petitioner is living outside the U.S. and determined not to be domiciled in the U.S., he or she can take steps to reestablish a domicile in the United States in order to qualify as a Sponsor and file an Affidavit of Support.  Such steps may include:

  • Purchasing or renting a home;
  • Opening a bank account;
  • Transferring funds to the United States;
  • Making investments in the United States;
  • Seeking employment in the United States;
  • Registering children in U.S. schools; and
  • Voting in local, State, or Federal elections.

Anyone wanting to sponsor a family member to immigrate to the U.S. but is currently living abroad should consider whether they have a domicile in the U.S., or understand the need to reestablish a domicile in the U.S., before filing a Form I-130 Petition for their relative.

Note this article addresses only Affidavits of Support based on a Petitioner filing a Form I-130 Petition.  In some instances, other immigrant visa applicants may require an Affidavit of Support.

If you have questions, contact us today at info@enterlinepartners.com and speak with a U.S. immigration attorney in Ho Chi Minh City, Manila and Taipei.

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office

Suite 601, 6th Floor, Saigon Tower
29 Le Duan Street
Ben Nghe Ward, District 1
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Tel: +84 933 301 488

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ

Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office

LKG Tower 37th Floor
6801 Ayala Avenue
Makati City, Philippines 1226

Tel: +632 5310 1491

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines

Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

Copyright 2022. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

successful i-130 dcf approval hcmc

Enterline and Partners Succesfully Expedites I-130 Petition with Direct Consular Filing at the U.S. Consulate in Ho Chi Minh City

Enterline and Partners is pleased to announce that our attorneys have successfully represented another client with Direct Consular Filing (“DCF”) of  an I-130 Petition for Alien Relative (“I-130 Petition”) at the U.S. Consulate in Ho Chi Minh City (“Consulate.”) Our clients, a U.S. citizen and Vietnamese citizen, approached us after the U.S. citizen received a job offer which required his immediate relocation back to the United States. Following our consultation session in which we thoroughly discussed how DCF is adjudicated as well as advising that it remains discretionary, the couple decided to proceed and engaged our office to file the initial DCF request. Our team worked diligently in gathering all of the required and supplemental documentation needed before the DCF request could be filed. Once everything was finalized, we submitted the request. Less than a week later, the Consulate approved our DCF request and scheduled the client to file the

Read more >
supreme court

Supreme Court Hands the Trump Administration a Partial Victory in Ongoing Birthright Citizenship Litigation

The United States Supreme Court has given President Donald Trump’s Executive Order (“EO”) curbing birthright citizenship a partial victory. The ruling does not impact “Birthright Citizenship” but rather restricts district court judges from issuing nation-wide (or “universal”) injunctions against Executive Orders.  In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that lower federal court judges who issued nationwide injunctions against the EO went too far and granted the Trump Administration’s request to narrow the injunctions issued in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts. While the Supreme Court’s ruling was a dramatic shift in how lower federal court judges have operated for years, the decision left enough room for challengers to the EO to prevent it from taking effect while litigation works its way through the federal court system. Specifically, the EO, which also suffered a setback by the Federal Court of Appeals will remain blocked for an additional thirty (30) days) allowing the

Read more >
form i0854

When Do Sponsor Obligations End Under Form I-864?

For immigrants to the United States, the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support (“Form I-864”), is a critical part of the family-based immigration process. It is a legally enforceable contract in which a sponsor agrees to financially support the intended immigrant, helping ensure that the immigrant does not rely on certain U.S. government benefits after becoming a permanent resident. By signing Form I-864, the sponsor takes on long-term financial responsibility, but this obligation is not indefinite. The U.S. government outlines specific situations under which the sponsor’s duties come to an end. When Will These Obligations End?  A sponsors obligations under a Form I-864 end when the sponsored immigrant: A sponsor’s obligations under a Form I-864 also end if the sponsor dies. As such, the sponsor’s estate is not required to take responsibility for the sponsored immigrant following the sponsor’s death. Divorce does not terminate the responsibility, and if the sponsor dies,

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon