Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Search
Close this search box.

Enterline and Co-Counsel Obtain Settlement With USCIS On Writ of Mandamus Action To Process I-829 Petitions

On March 4, 2022, Mr. Enterline of Enterline and Partners, working with co-counsel in the United States, helped file a complaint in Federal Court for multiple EB-5 investors waiting for action on their Form I-829, Petition by Investor to Remove Conditions on Permanent Residence Status (“I-829 Petition).  The law suit was filed against the Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) and requested the Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to order the USCIS to take action on the investor’s I-829 Petitions.

In late April, the U.S. Attorney representing the USCIS responded with an offer of settlement of the case in which the USCIS proposed to review the I-829 Petitions within 120, 150 and 180 days, based on the year of filing the I-829 Petition.  Mr. Enterline and co-counsel made a counteroffer requesting that the USCIS agree to review the I-829 Petitions within 90 days (for Petitions filed in 2019), 120 days (for Petitions filed in 2020) and 150 days (for Petitions filed in 2021).  On May 12, 2022, the U.S. Attorney on behalf of the USCIS agreed to the counter settlement offer.

In addition to the agreement to review and take action on the I-829 Petitions within those time periods, the settlement included additional terms.

Request for Evidence/Notice of Intent to Deny (RFE/NOID)

“If” USCIS issues a request for evidence (“RFE”) or a notice of intent to deny (“NOID”), the USCIS will agree to make a decision within 60 days of receiving the response to the RFE/NOID.   We write “if” because most I-829 Petitions are identified as approvable at the time of filing and will be approved once they are finally reviewed.

Biometrics 

The USCIS will assess the need for updated biometrics at the point that each I-829 Petition is being adjudicated and will promptly communicate that need to the investor.  In some case, the USCIS may request new biometrics to be taken, such as when there are young children who have aged several years.

Green Card Printing

The USCIS Investor Program Office (“IPO”) will work to ensure that upon the approval of the I-829 Petition, all data entered into USCIS systems for Form I-551 “green card” production is correct at the time of final adjudication to minimize the risk of delay if there are errors on the cards.  Errors on printed green cards are remedied by way of Form I-90 filed with the USCIS, not the IPO, so the IPO is not able to commit other agency components to a specific timeframe for corrections, if needed.

One of the reasons that USCIS/IPO is requesting the multiple periods to review the I-829 Petitions is that evidence suggests, and the EB-5 stakeholder community believes, that the IPO is short of staff because of the lapse in the regional center program and many of its staff were transferred out of the IPO or no longer work there; therefore, the IPO does not have the manpower to review so many I-829 Petitioners at one time.

If you have been waiting for a decision on an I-829 Petition for several years, you should consider joining us in our next complaint in Federal Court.  Investors who have filed as recently as 2021 have a credible cause of action.

Form I-526 Petitions

We are also filing complaints with Federal Courts for investors who filed Form I-526 Petition, Immigrant Petition for Alien Entrepreneur as recently at 2019.  If you have been waiting for an approval on your Form I-526 since in or before 2019, we can help.

Writ of Mandamus actions are being filed by hundreds if not thousands of investors right now.  With the lack of manpower at IPO, if you are not filing a complaint with the Federal Court for a Writ of Mandamus, it is possible that your petition will fall further to the back of the processing line.

If you want more information on filing for Writs of Mandamus, contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com and speak with a U.S. immigration attorney in Ho Chi Minh City, Manila and Taipei.

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office

Suite 601, 6th Floor, Saigon Tower
29 Le Duan Street
Ben Nghe Ward, District 1
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Tel: +84 933 301 488

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ

Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office

LKG Tower 37th Floor
6801 Ayala Avenue
Makati City, Philippines 1226

Tel: +632 5310 1491

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines

Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

Copyright 2022. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

Federal Lawsuit Filed Immediately Following Trump’s Executive Order Ending Birthright Citizenship

Less than 2 hours after President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order (“EO”) attempting to end birthright citizenship, immigrant advocates started to file lawsuits in Federal Court attempting to block Trump’s Executive Order. The first lawsuit was filed in the U.S. Federal District Court of New Hampshire  on behalf of a group representing Indonesian migrants in the State. It was signed by a total of twenty-six (26) attorneys representing the American Civil Liberties Union, State Democracy Defends Fund, the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Endowment Fund, League of United Latin American Citizens and Make the Road New York as plaintiffs. Following New Hampshire, more than two dozen additional lawsuits were filed against the EO in Federal District Courts contending that the EO violates the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment, U.S. Supreme Court precedent since 1898 (United States v. Wong Kim Ark), as well as federal law which has been practiced

Read more >

Can My Fiance Work in the U.S. After Arriving on a K-1 Visa?

One your fiance arrives in the United States on a K-1 visa and you are married within ninety (90) days upon arrival, you and your fiance will need to file for adjustment of status with the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) in order to convert the K-1 fiance nonimmigrant visa status to lawful permanent resident status. As part of the adjustment process, applicants have the option of filing a Form I-131, Application for Travel Documents, Parole Documents, and Arrival/ Departure Records with their Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status. Approval of the Form I-131 will result in Advance Parole allowing for international travel while waiting for USCIS to approve the Form I-485. Applicants also have the option to file a Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization (“EAD”) while USCIS adjudicates the adjustment application. Once the EAD is approved, they will have valid status and

Read more >

What is the Four Month Validity Period of an Approved I-129F Petition for a K-1 Visa?

Once the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) approves an I-129F Petition for Alien Fiancé, the foreign fiancé typically has four (4) months to apply for a K-1 fiancé visa at a U.S. Embassy or Consulate. However, due to the time that it takes for an approved petition to be sent and received by the National Visa Center and then forwarded to the foreign fiancé’s embassy or consulate where he/she will undergo a visa interview, petition revalidation is possible. While the interviewing consular officer will often automatically revalidate an expired petition, demonstrating ongoing intent that the U.S. citizen and foreign fiancé intend to marry within ninety (90) days upon the foreign fiancé’s arrival in the United States may be requested. The rationale behind requesting updated documentation showing continued marital intent is to ensure that the couple’s bona-fide relationship remains current and genuine. It further helps to reduce prolonged processing

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon