Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Search
Close this search box.

David Enterline’s Thought Leadership Comments on the Investment Immigration Industry

 

As part of the GMWM East Asia event, organizers requested insight from its distinguished speakers on various Thought Leadership topics. The comments below were provided by David Enterline of Enterline and Partners.

1. In one sentence, how would you describe the state of the investment immigration industry today?

The investment immigration industry has continued to expand in the last 10 years with ever more countries rolling out programs to attract the wealthy and their assets (i.e., cash) to park in-country and boost the economy (to some small degree) in exchange for residency and citizenship.

2. Chinese investors have been the predominant source of capital for the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program. However, with an increase in minimum TEA investment threshold from $500K to $900K and $1M to $1.8M in non-TEAs, in addition to long waiting times, how will it affect the appeal of EB-5 for Chinese investors?

The EB-5 market in China has already suffered tremendously since 2018 once the market fully grasped that Chinese investors would be subject to an estimated 15 year wait for their EB-5 visas to become available and obtain their permanent residence. Primarily as a result of the long waiting time, world-wide EB-5 investor I-526 Petition filings fell from 14,373 in FY2015, 14,147 in FY2016 and 12,165 in FY2017 to 6,424 investors in FY2018, with approximately 80-85% estimated from China during those three year. A growing portion of these 2018 filings were from the second to fifth ranked countries of Vietnam, India, South Korea and Taiwan as well as modest increases of investors from around the rest of the world. Therefore, the long waiting time has already impacted the China market. Other economic and political forces, as well as the growing number of alternative attractive residence and citizenship programs will likely continue to have bearing on continued low interest from Chinese for the EB-5 program, more so than the increase to the minimum investment of $900,000.

3. How do you see the industry evolving over the next 5 years?

I believe we will continue to see expansion in the investment immigration business as the number of programs increase and become more competitive and as high net worth individuals continue to seek second and even third country resident status and citizenship.

 

For more information, please contact us at

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING
Ad: 3F, IBC building, 1A Cong Truong Me Linh Str, District 1, HCMC.
Tel: 0933 301 488
CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

Enterline and Partners Succesfully Expedites I-130 Petition with Direct Consular Filing at the U.S. Consulate in Ho Chi Minh City

Enterline and Partners is pleased to announce that our attorneys have successfully represented another client with Direct Consular Filing (“DCF”) of  an I-130 Petition for Alien Relative (“I-130 Petition”) at the U.S. Consulate in Ho Chi Minh City (“Consulate.”) Our clients, a U.S. citizen and Vietnamese citizen, approached us after the U.S. citizen received a job offer which required his immediate relocation back to the United States. Following our consultation session in which we thoroughly discussed how DCF is adjudicated as well as advising that it remains discretionary, the couple decided to proceed and engaged our office to file the initial DCF request. Our team worked diligently in gathering all of the required and supplemental documentation needed before the DCF request could be filed. Once everything was finalized, we submitted the request. Less than a week later, the Consulate approved our DCF request and scheduled the client to file the

Read more >

Supreme Court Hands the Trump Administration a Partial Victory in Ongoing Birthright Citizenship Litigation

The United States Supreme Court has given President Donald Trump’s Executive Order (“EO”) curbing birthright citizenship a partial victory. The ruling does not impact “Birthright Citizenship” but rather restricts district court judges from issuing nation-wide (or “universal”) injunctions against Executive Orders.  In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that lower federal court judges who issued nationwide injunctions against the EO went too far and granted the Trump Administration’s request to narrow the injunctions issued in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts. While the Supreme Court’s ruling was a dramatic shift in how lower federal court judges have operated for years, the decision left enough room for challengers to the EO to prevent it from taking effect while litigation works its way through the federal court system. Specifically, the EO, which also suffered a setback by the Federal Court of Appeals will remain blocked for an additional thirty (30) days) allowing the

Read more >

When Do Sponsor Obligations End Under Form I-864?

For immigrants to the United States, the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support (“Form I-864”), is a critical part of the family-based immigration process. It is a legally enforceable contract in which a sponsor agrees to financially support the intended immigrant, helping ensure that the immigrant does not rely on certain U.S. government benefits after becoming a permanent resident. By signing Form I-864, the sponsor takes on long-term financial responsibility, but this obligation is not indefinite. The U.S. government outlines specific situations under which the sponsor’s duties come to an end. When Will These Obligations End?  A sponsors obligations under a Form I-864 end when the sponsored immigrant: A sponsor’s obligations under a Form I-864 also end if the sponsor dies. As such, the sponsor’s estate is not required to take responsibility for the sponsored immigrant following the sponsor’s death. Divorce does not terminate the responsibility, and if the sponsor dies,

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon