Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Search
Close this search box.

Deferred Enforcement Departure for Certain Residents of Hong Kong

On August 5, 2021, President Biden issued the “Deferred Enforcement Departure for Certain Residents of Hong Kong” memorandum (the “Memorandum”), directing the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) to take appropriate measures to defer for 18 months the removal of Hong Kong residents presently in the United States. Hong Kong residents in the United States whose removal has been deferred will also be able to request employment authorization through the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”). The Memorandum further directs Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro N. Mayorkas to consider suspending regulatory requirements with respect to F-1 nonimmigrant students who are Hong Kong residents.  We must wait to see how USCIS will implement such measures.

According to DHS Secretary Mayorkas, “This decision to offer safety and protection to these individuals was made based on the ongoing assault on democracy, and rights and freedoms in Hong Kong by the People’s Republic of China (PRC)… The United States stands with the people of Hong Kong in support of rights and freedoms.”

The measures will apply to any Hong Kong resident who is present in the United States on the date of the Memorandum except for those:

  1. Who have voluntarily returned to Hong Kong or the PRC after the date of the Memorandum;
  2. Who have not continuously resided in the U.S. since the date of the Memorandum;
  3. Who are inadmissible under Section 212(a)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) (association with terrorist organizations) or deportable under Section 237(a)(4) of the INA (deportability for security and related grounds such as espionage, terrorist activities, or participation in genocide or extrajudicial killings);
  4. Who have been convicted of any felony or two or more misdemeanors committed in the U.S., or who meet any of the criteria set forth in section 208(b)(2)(A) of the INA;
  5. Who are subject to extradition;
  6. Whose presence in the U.S. is not in the interest of the U.S. or presents a danger to public safety; or
  7. Whose presence in the U.S. would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States.

One potential issue that needs to be addressed in the measures to be implemented is how a deferral will affect Hong Kong resident’s lawful status. Nonimmigrants who remain in the U.S. beyond their approved period are considered “out of status”. Accruing 6 months of time out of status may subject such persons to a 3-year bar to reentering the U.S. at a later time. Accruing 12 months of time out of status may subject such persons to a 10-year bar to reentering the United States. Hopefully this issue will be addressed by the USCIS measures that will be adopted by extending lawful status or tolling the accrual of unlawful status during the deferment.

If you think you might be eligible for the deferred enforcement and have questions, contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com and speak with a U.S. immigration attorney in Ho Chi Minh City, Manila and Taipei.

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office

Suite 601, 6th Floor, Saigon Tower
29 Le Duan Street
Ben Nghe Ward, District 1
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Tel: +84 933 301 488

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ

Website: http://enterlinepartners.com

Manila, Philippines Office

LKG Tower 37th Floor
6801 Ayala Avenue
Makati City, Philippines 1226

Tel: +632 5310 1491

Email: info@enterlinepartners.com

Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines

Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/

Copyright 2021. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline and Partners only.

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

Supreme Court Hands the Trump Administration a Partial Victory in Ongoing Birthright Citizenship Litigation

The United States Supreme Court has given President Donald Trump’s Executive Order (“EO”) curbing birthright citizenship a partial victory. The ruling does not impact “Birthright Citizenship” but rather restricts district court judges from issuing nation-wide (or “universal”) injunctions against Executive Orders.  In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that lower federal court judges who issued nationwide injunctions against the EO went too far and granted the Trump Administration’s request to narrow the injunctions issued in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts. While the Supreme Court’s ruling was a dramatic shift in how lower federal court judges have operated for years, the decision left enough room for challengers to the EO to prevent it from taking effect while litigation works its way through the federal court system. Specifically, the EO, which also suffered a setback by the Federal Court of Appeals will remain blocked for an additional thirty (30) days) allowing the

Read more >

When Do Sponsor Obligations End Under Form I-864?

For immigrants to the United States, the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support (“Form I-864”), is a critical part of the family-based immigration process. It is a legally enforceable contract in which a sponsor agrees to financially support the intended immigrant, helping ensure that the immigrant does not rely on certain U.S. government benefits after becoming a permanent resident. By signing Form I-864, the sponsor takes on long-term financial responsibility, but this obligation is not indefinite. The U.S. government outlines specific situations under which the sponsor’s duties come to an end. When Will These Obligations End?  A sponsors obligations under a Form I-864 end when the sponsored immigrant: A sponsor’s obligations under a Form I-864 also end if the sponsor dies. As such, the sponsor’s estate is not required to take responsibility for the sponsored immigrant following the sponsor’s death. Divorce does not terminate the responsibility, and if the sponsor dies,

Read more >

F, M and J Student Visa Interviews to Resume with Enhanced Social Media Vetting

The United States Department of State (“DOS”) has instructed Embassies and Consulates to begin accepting new F, M, and J student visa application appointments following a temporary suspension. The pause was initiated to allow DOS to implement policy changes regarding social media vetting. After the suspension, e F, M, and J student visa applicants are required to make their social media accounts public for vetting purposes. In a DOS announcement, DOS will use all information available for “visa screening and vetting to identify visa applicants who are inadmissible to the United States, including those who pose a threat to U.S. national security. Under this new guidance, we will conduct a comprehensive and thorough vetting, including online presence, of all student and exchange visitor applicants in the F, M, and J nonimmigrant classifications.” The new policy, following the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to begin screening anti-Semitic online activity posted by

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon