January 24, 2025

Federal Lawsuit Filed Immediately Following Trump’s Executive Order Ending Birthright Citizenship

Less than 2 hours after President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order (“EO”) attempting to end birthright citizenship, immigrant advocates started to file lawsuits in Federal Court attempting to block Trump’s Executive Order.

The first lawsuit was filed in the U.S. Federal District Court of New Hampshire on behalf of a group representing Indonesian migrants in the State. It was signed by a total of twenty-six (26) attorneys representing the American Civil Liberties Union, State Democracy Defends Fund, the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Endowment Fund, League of United Latin American Citizens and Make the Road New York as plaintiffs.

Following New Hampshire, more than two dozen additional lawsuits were filed against the EO in Federal District Courts contending that the EO violates the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment, U.S. Supreme Court precedent since 1898 (United States v. Wong Kim Ark), as well as federal law which has been practiced for over eighty (80) years.

Shortly thereafter, a federal judge in Seattle issued an order temporarily blocking the EO which was scheduled to take effect on February 19, 2025 – one month after Trump was sworn in as the 47th President.

In his ruling, Judge John Coughenour said the EO “boggles the mind.” Judge Coughenour further told the court that he does not remember in his more than 40 years on the bench as a federal judge seeing a case that was so “blatantly unconstitutional.”

For more information on the EO ending birthright citizenship and upcoming legal challenges, contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com.

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING  

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office  

146C7 Nguyen Van Huong St, Thao Dien Ward,  
District 2, Thu Duc City  
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam  

Tel: +84 933 301 488  
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com  
Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ  
YouTube: @EnterlineAndPartnersConsulting  
Website: http://enterlinepartners.com  

Manila, Philippines Office  

LKG Tower 37th Floor 
6801 Ayala Avenue  
Makati City, Philippines 1226  

Tel: +63 917 543 7926  
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com  
Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines  
Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/  

Copyright 2025. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline & Partners only. 

Categories: Birthright Citizenship, Executive Order, Trump

Tags: Birthright Citizenship, Executive Order (EO), government, Trump Administration

Passport Revocation for Child Support Arrears

Protection from Regional Center Program Expiration – Grandfathering before September 30, 2026

David Enterline Receives Recognition by AILA APAC for Contributions to the Chapter

Visa Application Processing at U.S. Consulates for the E-1 Treaty Trader and E-2 Treaty Investor Visa

our services

contact us today for more information

Latest News

K-1 Fiancé(e)’ Visa vs. CR-1 Spousal Visa: Which is the Right Path For Your Vietnamese Fiance(é) Or Spouse?

For many American and Vietnamese couples looking to immigrate to the United States, a major question is whether they should apply for a K-1 fiancé(é) visa or a CR-1 spousal visa. While both lead to lawful permanent residence status (“Green Card”), they work very differently. A K-1 fiancé(e) visa allows a Vietnamese fiance(é) to enter the United States so the couple can marry within ninety (90) days upon the Vietnamese fiance(é)’s arrival. A CR-1 spousal visa allows a Vietnamese spouse to enter the United States with an immigrant visa and be granted CR-1 status if the couple is married for less than two (2) years. The right choice depends on many factors such as your relationship status, wedding plans, timeline, budget, and long-term priorities. We compare the K-1 fiancé(e) and CR-1 options for American and Vietnamese couples including eligibility, timelines, filing fees, work authorization, international travel, and common situations where

Passport Revocation for Child Support Arrears

On May 7, 2026, the United States Department of State (“DOS”) announced that it will begin revoking U.S. passports for certain individuals with outstanding child support arrears. Under existing federal regulations (22 CFR §51.62) and DOS policy guidance (7 FAM 1754), DOS may deny or revoke a U.S. passport when the Department of Health and Human Services (“DHHS”) certifies that an individual owes more than US$2,500 in child support. Although this authority has existed for years, the announcement signals increased enforcement efforts. According to recent reports, the initial phase may focus on individuals with arrears exceeding US$100,000, with broader enforcement potentially expanding to all individuals owing more than US$2,500. Once revoked, a passport may no longer be used for international travel. In most cases, the individual will not become eligible for a new passport until DHHS certifies that the child support arrears have been resolved. If an individual is overseas

Protection from Regional Center Program Expiration – Grandfathering before September 30, 2026

The EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 (“RIA”) introduced several important changes to the EB-5 Regional Center Program. One of the most important protections for investors is commonly referred to as the “grandfathering” provision found in Section 108 of the RIA, titled “Protection from Expired Legislation.” Since its creation in 1993, the EB-5 Regional Center Program has always been a pilot, or “test”, program. Historically, it has required periodic reauthorization by the United States Congress. In the past, temporary lapses in authorization created uncertainty for investors with pending I-526E, Immigrant Petition by Regional Center Investor petitions. Many investors were at risk that USCIS would stop processing their cases if the Regional Center Program expired before petition approval or visa issuance. To address these concerns, Congress included additional protections in the RIA intended to help investors continue moving forward with their immigration process even if the Regional Center Program expires

Federal Lawsuit Filed Immediately Following Trump’s Executive Order Ending Birthright Citizenship

CATEGORY

contact us today for more information

Latest News

Need help with your U.S. visa?Talk to our experts today.

Need help with your U.S. visa?
Talk to our experts today.