Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Search
Close this search box.

What is Advance Parole and How is it Different from a Re-Entry Permit?

Foreign nationals who arrive in the United States as nonimmigrants and then file for  adjustment of status may also file for advance parole in conjunction with their Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status with the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”).

Advance Parole differs from a Re-Entry Permit because while both use the same form; Form I-131, Application for Travel Documents, Parole Documents, and Arrival/Departure Records, USCIS issues Advance Parole to those seeking to temporarily depart the United States before their lawful permanent residence is approved. A re-entry permit is for those who are already lawful permanent residents and are looking to travel outside the United States for a short period without abandoning their permanent resident status. 

An example of a foreign national who would be eligible for Advance Parole is somebody who entered the U.S. on a K-1 fiancé visa. After arriving and marrying their U.S. citizen fiancé within 90 days, the new immigrant spouse  should file for adjustment of status. If the new immigrant spouse  needs  to travel abroad (i.e. visit the foreign national’s family during the adjustment period), Advance Parole would be required in order to return to the United States. Thus, having been approved for Advance Parole would allow for the foreign national to depart and return without abandoning their ongoing adjustment of status application.

Once the adjustment of status has been approved, the new immigrant spouse will have lawful permanent residence and Advance Parole is no longer required to re-enter the United States.  The new immigrant spouse would use their Form I-551 “Green Card” as a visa to reenter the United States.  If the lawful permanent resident is looking to spend a prolonged period of time outside the U.S., applying for a re-entry permit with USCIS may be necessary.

For more information on advance parole and re-entry permits, contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com.

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING   

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office   

146C7 Nguyen Van Huong St, Thao Dien Ward,   
District 2, Thu Duc City   
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam   

Tel: +84 933 301 488   
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com   
Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ   
YouTube: @EnterlineAndPartnersConsulting   
Website: http://enterlinepartners.com   

Manila, Philippines Office   

LKG Tower 37th Floor  
6801 Ayala Avenue   
Makati City, Philippines 1226   

Tel: +63 917 543 7926   
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com   
Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines   
Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/   

Copyright 2025. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline & Partners only.

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

Trump’s EO Ending Birthright Citizenship Dealt Another Setback by A Second Judge

President Donald Trump’s Executive Order (“EO”) ending birthright citizenship was dealt another setback after a second federal judge ordered an additional pause. Judge Deborah Boardman of the Federal District of Maryland issued a nationwide injunction against the EO commenting that no court in the country has endorsed the Trump administration’s interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Boardman’s ruling comes after Judge John Coughenour of Washington State ordered a temporary injunction after commenting that the EO “boggles the mind” and could not remember seeing a case that was more blatantly unconstitutional in more than 40 years on the bench as a federal judge. For more information on upcoming legal challenges surrounding Trump’s EO ending birthright citizenship, contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com. ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING    Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office    146C7 Nguyen Van Huong St, Thao Dien Ward,   District 2, Thu Duc City   Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam    Tel: +84 933 301 488   Email: info@enterlinepartners.com   Facebook: Enterline &

Read more >

USCIS Will No Longer Require Covid -19 Vaccinations For Adjustment Of Status Applicants

Effective January 22, 2025, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) will no longer require adjustment of status applicants to present proof of a COVID-19 vaccination as part of their Form I-693, Report of Immigration Medical Examination and Vaccination Record. The USCIS further commented that the agency will no longer issue Requests for Evidence or a Notice of Intent to Deny related to COVID-19 vaccinations. Applicants applying for immigrant visas at a U.S. Embassy or Consulate are still required to present COVID-19 vaccinations when undergoing a medical evaluation by a panel physician at a clinic licensed by the Centers of Disease Control. Immigrant visa applicants who are unable to present proof of a COVID-19 vaccination may be eligible for a waiver. For more information, contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com. ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING    Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office    146C7 Nguyen Van Huong St, Thao Dien Ward,   District 2, Thu Duc

Read more >

Federal Lawsuit Filed Immediately Following Trump’s Executive Order Ending Birthright Citizenship

Less than 2 hours after President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order (“EO”) attempting to end birthright citizenship, immigrant advocates started to file lawsuits in Federal Court attempting to block Trump’s Executive Order. The first lawsuit was filed in the U.S. Federal District Court of New Hampshire  on behalf of a group representing Indonesian migrants in the State. It was signed by a total of twenty-six (26) attorneys representing the American Civil Liberties Union, State Democracy Defends Fund, the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Endowment Fund, League of United Latin American Citizens and Make the Road New York as plaintiffs. Following New Hampshire, more than two dozen additional lawsuits were filed against the EO in Federal District Courts contending that the EO violates the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment, U.S. Supreme Court precedent since 1898 (United States v. Wong Kim Ark), as well as federal law which has been practiced

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon