Congratulations to Enterline and Partners’ David Enterline who has reached a 30 year anniversary of first becoming an American Immigration Lawyers Association (“AILA”) member. AILA is the 16,000+ association of U.S. and international lawyers who practice U.S. immigration law. During his membership, David has been active as a member in the Asia-Pacific Chapter serving in various roles of leadership in the Chapter. Both David and partner Ryan Barshop are active members and often speak at regional and national AILA events on various immigration topics. If you have question about U.S. visas and immigration, please contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com. ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office 146C7 Nguyen Van Huong St, Thao Dien Ward,District 2, Thu Duc CityHo Chi Minh City, Vietnam Tel: +84 933 301 488Email: info@enterlinepartners.comFacebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa KỳYouTube: @EnterlineAndPartnersConsultingWebsite: http://enterlinepartners.com Manila, Philippines Office LKG Tower 37th Floor 6801 Ayala
Enterline and Partners is pleased to announce that our attorneys have successfully represented another client with Direct Consular Filing (“DCF”) of an I-130 Petition for Alien Relative (“I-130 Petition”) at the U.S. Consulate in Ho Chi Minh City (“Consulate.”) Our clients, a U.S. citizen and Vietnamese citizen, approached us after the U.S. citizen received a job offer which required his immediate relocation back to the United States. Following our consultation session in which we thoroughly discussed how DCF is adjudicated as well as advising that it remains discretionary, the couple decided to proceed and engaged our office to file the initial DCF request. Our team worked diligently in gathering all of the required and supplemental documentation needed before the DCF request could be filed. Once everything was finalized, we submitted the request. Less than a week later, the Consulate approved our DCF request and scheduled the client to file the
The United States Supreme Court has given President Donald Trump’s Executive Order (“EO”) curbing birthright citizenship a partial victory. The ruling does not impact “Birthright Citizenship” but rather restricts district court judges from issuing nation-wide (or “universal”) injunctions against Executive Orders. In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that lower federal court judges who issued nationwide injunctions against the EO went too far and granted the Trump Administration’s request to narrow the injunctions issued in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts. While the Supreme Court’s ruling was a dramatic shift in how lower federal court judges have operated for years, the decision left enough room for challengers to the EO to prevent it from taking effect while litigation works its way through the federal court system. Specifically, the EO, which also suffered a setback by the Federal Court of Appeals will remain blocked for an additional thirty (30) days) allowing the
Copyright 2012 – 2024 Enterline and Partners Consulting | All Rights Reserved
