Enterline & Partners Consulting | info@enterlinepartners.com

Search
Close this search box.

What is Advance Parole and How is it Different from a Re-Entry Permit?

Foreign nationals who arrive in the United States as nonimmigrants and then file for  adjustment of status may also file for advance parole in conjunction with their Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status with the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”).

Advance Parole differs from a Re-Entry Permit because while both use the same form; Form I-131, Application for Travel Documents, Parole Documents, and Arrival/Departure Records, USCIS issues Advance Parole to those seeking to temporarily depart the United States before their lawful permanent residence is approved. A re-entry permit is for those who are already lawful permanent residents and are looking to travel outside the United States for a short period without abandoning their permanent resident status. 

An example of a foreign national who would be eligible for Advance Parole is somebody who entered the U.S. on a K-1 fiancé visa. After arriving and marrying their U.S. citizen fiancé within 90 days, the new immigrant spouse  should file for adjustment of status. If the new immigrant spouse  needs  to travel abroad (i.e. visit the foreign national’s family during the adjustment period), Advance Parole would be required in order to return to the United States. Thus, having been approved for Advance Parole would allow for the foreign national to depart and return without abandoning their ongoing adjustment of status application.

Once the adjustment of status has been approved, the new immigrant spouse will have lawful permanent residence and Advance Parole is no longer required to re-enter the United States.  The new immigrant spouse would use their Form I-551 “Green Card” as a visa to reenter the United States.  If the lawful permanent resident is looking to spend a prolonged period of time outside the U.S., applying for a re-entry permit with USCIS may be necessary.

For more information on advance parole and re-entry permits, contact us at info@enterlinepartners.com.

ENTERLINE & PARTNERS CONSULTING   

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Office   

146C7 Nguyen Van Huong St, Thao Dien Ward,   
District 2, Thu Duc City   
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam   

Tel: +84 933 301 488   
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com   
Facebook: Enterline & Partners – Dịch vụ Thị thực và Định cư Hoa Kỳ   
YouTube: @EnterlineAndPartnersConsulting   
Website: http://enterlinepartners.com   

Manila, Philippines Office   

LKG Tower 37th Floor  
6801 Ayala Avenue   
Makati City, Philippines 1226   

Tel: +63 917 543 7926   
Email: info@enterlinepartners.com   
Facebook: Enterline and Partners Philippines   
Website: https://enterlinepartners.com/language/en/welcome/   

Copyright 2025. This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article may be changed with or without notice. The opinions expressed in this article are those of Enterline & Partners only.

CATEGORY
time
recent posts
CTA_Collection

Over 18,000 successful customers with Enterline &
Partners, realizing the dream of immigration

Latest News

Supreme Court Hands the Trump Administration a Partial Victory in Ongoing Birthright Citizenship Litigation

The United States Supreme Court has given President Donald Trump’s Executive Order (“EO”) curbing birthright citizenship a partial victory. The ruling does not impact “Birthright Citizenship” but rather restricts district court judges from issuing nation-wide (or “universal”) injunctions against Executive Orders.  In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that lower federal court judges who issued nationwide injunctions against the EO went too far and granted the Trump Administration’s request to narrow the injunctions issued in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts. While the Supreme Court’s ruling was a dramatic shift in how lower federal court judges have operated for years, the decision left enough room for challengers to the EO to prevent it from taking effect while litigation works its way through the federal court system. Specifically, the EO, which also suffered a setback by the Federal Court of Appeals will remain blocked for an additional thirty (30) days) allowing the

Read more >

When Do Sponsor Obligations End Under Form I-864?

For immigrants to the United States, the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support (“Form I-864”), is a critical part of the family-based immigration process. It is a legally enforceable contract in which a sponsor agrees to financially support the intended immigrant, helping ensure that the immigrant does not rely on certain U.S. government benefits after becoming a permanent resident. By signing Form I-864, the sponsor takes on long-term financial responsibility, but this obligation is not indefinite. The U.S. government outlines specific situations under which the sponsor’s duties come to an end. When Will These Obligations End?  A sponsors obligations under a Form I-864 end when the sponsored immigrant: A sponsor’s obligations under a Form I-864 also end if the sponsor dies. As such, the sponsor’s estate is not required to take responsibility for the sponsored immigrant following the sponsor’s death. Divorce does not terminate the responsibility, and if the sponsor dies,

Read more >

F, M and J Student Visa Interviews to Resume with Enhanced Social Media Vetting

The United States Department of State (“DOS”) has instructed Embassies and Consulates to begin accepting new F, M, and J student visa application appointments following a temporary suspension. The pause was initiated to allow DOS to implement policy changes regarding social media vetting. After the suspension, e F, M, and J student visa applicants are required to make their social media accounts public for vetting purposes. In a DOS announcement, DOS will use all information available for “visa screening and vetting to identify visa applicants who are inadmissible to the United States, including those who pose a threat to U.S. national security. Under this new guidance, we will conduct a comprehensive and thorough vetting, including online presence, of all student and exchange visitor applicants in the F, M, and J nonimmigrant classifications.” The new policy, following the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to begin screening anti-Semitic online activity posted by

Read more >
Vietnam
icons8-exercise-96 chat-active-icon